Flyback Converter Secondary-Side Control via PWM Embedding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flyback power converters face inefficiencies in communication between the primary and secondary sides, requiring separate channels and additional components for signal synchronization and load power demand communication, which increases complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control loop with a galvanically-isolated communication channel that allows the secondary-side controller to transmit power mode selections to the primary-side controller, using only 2 bits per control message, reducing the frequency and size of feedback data, thus eliminating the need for a dedicated feedback channel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a separate communication channel with galvanic isolation (e.g., optoisolator) is used to communicate between secondary and primary sides, then communication reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the feedback communication function with existing power converter signal paths, specifically utilizing the PWM signal path and synchronization signals that already exist in the system. This eliminates the need for a completely separate galvanic isolation communication channel while maintaining communication reliability through clever signal embedding and timing-based discrimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Existing signal paths in the power converter are made multi-functional. The PWM signal path not only controls the power switches but also carries feedback information from the secondary side. Synchronization signals serve dual purposes for both timing coordination and communication channel establishment, reducing the need for dedicated communication hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional components are added to modulate existing signals for communication, then communication capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own operating signals (PWM, synchronization clocks) to carry communication information without requiring external modulation components. The secondary side controller modulates feedback information by embedding it in the timing and frequency characteristics of existing power converter signals, which then automatically demodulate on the primary side through timing analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Communication information is encoded by varying temporal parameters of existing signals rather than adding modulation components. The secondary side changes the timing, frequency, or duty cycle of synchronization and PWM-related signals to encode feedback data, which the primary side detects through precise timing measurement, avoiding the need for traditional modulation/demodulation hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a dedicated feedback channel is implemented, then control precision is improved, but resource usage and silicon footprint increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsilicon footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback communication utilizes the periodic nature of power converter switching cycles. Feedback information is transmitted at specific periodic intervals synchronized with the switching frequency, allowing the primary side to sample and process feedback data at optimized moments without requiring continuous dedicated communication resources, thus maintaining precision while reducing resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Productivity

If transmission frequency is reduced below clock frequency, then resource usage is improved, but control responsiveness may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource usageVSAvoidcontrol responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting load changes and proactively adjusting power delivery based on trends detected in the feedback information. Rather than reacting to every instantaneous change, the controller anticipates requirements and pre-adjusts operating parameters, maintaining responsiveness even with reduced transmission frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11626805B2Control loop for flyback power converter
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US11626805B2 patent drawing
  • US11626805B2 patent drawing
  • US11626805B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example controller for a flyback power converter includes a secondary-side circuit comprising a secondary-side controller. The secondary-side controller is configured to sense an electrical characteristic of a secondary-side output of the flyback power converter, select, based on the sensed electrical characteristic, a power mode, and transmit, over a communication channel, a control message specifying the selected power mode. A primary-side circuit of the controller includes a primary-side controller. The primary-side controller is configured to receive, over the communication channel, the control message specifying the selected power mode and control primary-side flyback drive circuitry of the primary-side circuit to drive a primary-side output of the flyback power converter according to the selected power mode so as to control a value of the electrical characteristic of the secondary-side output of the flyback power converter.