Fly-by-wire Control Laws for Rotorcraft Motion Decoupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rotorcraft flight control systems face challenges in decoupling aircraft motions, leading to increased pilot workload due to inherent coupling of flight dynamics, which existing feedback loops fail to adequately address, especially in aircraft with canted tail rotors.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a fly-by-wire control system with feed-forward control crossfeeds and washout mechanisms that anticipate and mitigate coupled aircraft motions, using high-pass filters and limiter circuits to process pilot inputs and adjust flight control commands, allowing the system to decouple aircraft motions and reduce pilot workload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If feedback loops are used to address coupled aircraft motions, then pilot workload is reduced, but the coupling effects are not adequately eliminated especially in aircraft with canted tail rotors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workloadVSAvoiddecoupling effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using feed-forward control crossfeeds that anticipate coupled aircraft motions before they occur. The washout filter processes pilot inputs to predict coupling effects and generate compensating commands in advance, rather than relying solely on feedback loops that react after coupling effects manifest. This proactive approach adequately eliminates coupling effects especially in aircraft with canted tail rotors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If washout filter is applied to decouple aircraft motions, then transient motion feedback is minimized, but steady-state position reflection may be delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot control qualityVSAvoidtransient response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the washout filter characteristics adaptive rather than fixed. The filter dynamically adjusts its washout rate based on flight conditions, allowing faster washout during transient maneuvers when rapid decoupling is needed, and slower washout during steady-state flight when accurate position reflection is prioritized. This dynamic adjustment optimizes both transient response and steady-state accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If feed-forward control crossfeeds are implemented, then coupled aircraft motions are anticipated and offset, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion decouplingVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing a washout filter as a mediating element between pilot inputs and the feed-forward control crossfeeds. The washout filter processes and shapes the pilot's control inputs before they are fed forward to generate decoupling commands, simplifying the overall system architecture. This intermediary approach maintains effective motion decoupling while managing system complexity through a unified filter-based control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10336438B2Rotorcraft fly-by-wire control laws
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • US10336438B2 patent drawing
  • US10336438B2 patent drawing
  • US10336438B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flight control system includes a pilot control module configured to receive commands from a pilot, a flight control module operable to transmit an instruction to change at least one operating condition of an aircraft, and a flight control computer in communication between the flight control module and the pilot control module. The flight control computer is configured to receive a pilot command to change a first flight characteristic, wherein changing the first flight characteristic would result in an expected change to a second flight characteristic. The flight control computer may instruct the flight control module to transmit an instruction to change a first operating condition of the aircraft and instruct the flight control module to transmit an instruction to change a second operating condition of the aircraft to at least partially offset the expected change to the second flight characteristic.