Flywheel Casing Bumpers Prevent Self-Acceleration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flywheel systems with circular casings fail to effectively control the uncontrolled rolling motion of a flywheel rotor after a catastrophic failure, leading to exponential increases in rolling speed and forces, resulting in catastrophic failure due to self-acceleration and lack of damping.

Innovation Solution

The flywheel system incorporates inward protruding bumpers on the casing wall, deviating from a circular shape, to disrupt the natural frequency of the flywheel's rotational motion, providing controlled impact points to dampen the rotor's motion and prevent self-acceleration, combined with optional reinforcement and a brake system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a circular casing wall is used to contain the flywheel rotor, then the flywheel rotor can be retained within defined confines, but in case of emergency the rotor may roll over the casing wall with uncontrolled acceleration and exponential increase in forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainment reliabilityVSAvoidrolling force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by replacing the perfectly circular casing wall with a non-circular cross-section that includes at least one inward protruding bumper. This asymmetric geometry creates predetermined contact points that disrupt the rotor's rolling motion and prevent uncontrolled acceleration, transforming the symmetric rolling path into a controlled interaction with specific bumper locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The inward protruding bumpers are positioned beforehand to intercept the rotor's rolling motion before it can gain uncontrolled speed. These bumpers act as pre-positioned energy absorption elements that engage with the rotor at specific points, providing controlled deceleration and preventing the exponential force increase that would occur with unrestricted rolling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Strength

If the casing wall is fortified to withstand rotor impact, then containment strength is improved, but the rotor may enter self-accelerating natural frequency mode and accelerate out of control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing strengthVSAvoidrotor speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The non-circular cross-section with inward protruding bumpers creates asymmetric contact geometry that disrupts the rotor's ability to enter resonant natural frequency modes. The irregular contact points prevent the establishment of uniform rolling conditions that would lead to self-acceleration, while the fortified casing maintains structural integrity during controlled bumper interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful uncontrolled rolling motion into a beneficial controlled interaction with the bumpers. The rotor's kinetic energy is channeled through predetermined contact points with the inward protruding bumpers, transforming the harmful unrestricted rolling into a controlled deceleration process that dissipates energy through friction and impact at specific locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Manufacturing precision

If a perfectly cylindrical liner is used in the casing, then manufacturing precision is improved, but damping capability against rotor upswing is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing cylindrical precisionVSAvoiddamping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent deliberately introduces asymmetry by adding inward protruding bumpers to the otherwise cylindrical casing structure. This modification sacrifices perfect cylindrical symmetry but gains significant damping capability, as the bumpers create controlled friction and impact interactions that dissipate the rotor's kinetic energy during emergency rolling motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The non-circular casing design effectively reduces the flywheel's acceleration and contact forces, allowing for controlled operation even in emergency situations, and the brake system further slows down the rotor, preventing catastrophic failures.

Implementation Method 1

the upswing of the flywheel rotor into an natural frequency or self-accelerating state is disrupted, and acceleration in an exponential or faster manner is prevented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNatural frequency disruption: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

rotation of the rotor will be converted into a rolling motion by the friction between the rotor and casing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

Initially, centrifugal and friction forces slowly increase, but in a previously unexpected manner thereafter an uncontrolled increase of the rolling effect and resulting forces quickly follows

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP3464935B1Flywheel system
Publication Date: 2020.11.25 S4 ENERGY BV
  • EP3464935B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3464935B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3464935B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a flywheel system (1), comprising a ring-shaped flywheel rotor (3), arranged on a rotation axis (7); and a substantially cylindrical casing (2), enveloping the flywheel rotor (3) at least in a radial direction to contain the flywheel (3) in case of a calamity. The flywheel system (1) further exhibits the feature that the casing (2) comprises and having at least one inward protruding bumper (8) defining a variation from the circular shape in cross section of the casing wall (5) surrounding the flywheel rotor (3). The casing wall (5) may itself be circular and the bumper (8) can define a deviation relative to the circular shape thereof, to enhance deceleration of the flywheel rotor (3), if, in case of an accident or calamity, the flywheel rotor (3) comes loose.