FM Receiver Error Correction Using Coherent and Differential Demodulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing FM receivers with RDS or RBDS units face limitations in error correction due to the inefficiency of burst error correction techniques, especially in the presence of additive white Gaussian noise, and differential demodulation techniques result in low sensitivity and performance gain.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that involve quantizing demodulated signals, grouping bits into blocks, computing syndromes, and identifying errors based on coherent and differential demodulation types to correct errors effectively, using predefined syndromes and errors for each type of demodulation to improve error correction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If burst error correction technique is used, then error correction capability is provided, but it can only correct errors in consecutive locations with burst length not exceeding five, resulting in low performance gain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoidperformance gain
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the error correction process by dividing the received data into multiple blocks, each containing a specific number of bits. Different blocks are processed with different error correction techniques based on their characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to handle various error patterns more effectively than a single burst error correction technique, improving overall performance gain while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the error correction parameters dynamically based on the block size and error characteristics. Different blocks are assigned different correction capabilities and thresholds. This parameter adaptation enables the system to optimize error correction performance for varying signal conditions, achieving higher performance gain without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If differential demodulation technique is used, then demodulation is achieved, but it results in low performance gain in decibels and low sensitivity performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemodulation capabilityVSAvoidsensitivity performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection between different demodulation techniques based on signal conditions. The system can switch between differential demodulation and other demodulation methods depending on the received signal quality and noise characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain ease of operation while significantly improving sensitivity performance and reliability in various operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor signal quality and adjust demodulation parameters accordingly. By continuously assessing signal conditions and adjusting the demodulation process based on feedback, the system maintains operational simplicity while enhancing sensitivity and overall performance reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If coherent demodulation is used, then higher performance gain is achieved, but the complexity of error correction processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance gainVSAvoiderror correction processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data into blocks of different sizes and applies coherent demodulation selectively to blocks that benefit from it. Not all blocks require the same level of processing, so this segmentation allows the system to achieve high performance gain where needed while reducing overall processing complexity by applying simpler methods to other blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different error correction and demodulation qualities to different blocks based on their specific characteristics and requirements. Some blocks receive more intensive coherent processing while others receive simplified handling. This local quality approach enables the system to achieve high overall performance gain without uniformly increasing complexity across all processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8498349B2Demodulation and decoding for frequency modulation (FM) receivers with radio data system (RDS) or radio broadcast data system (RBDS)
Publication Date: 2013.07.30 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US8498349B2 patent drawing
  • US8498349B2 patent drawing
  • US8498349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Demodulation and decoding for frequency modulation (FM) receivers with radio data system (RDS) or radio broadcast data system (RBDS). An example of a method for processing a signal in a receiver includes quantizing a demodulated signal to generate bits in response to receipt of the demodulated signal. The method also includes grouping the bits into one or more blocks. The method further includes computing a syndrome for a block from the one or more blocks. Moreover, the method includes identifying error, corresponding to the syndrome, in the block based on type of demodulation. The type of demodulation includes a coherent demodulation and a differential demodulation. Furthermore, the method includes correcting the error in the block.