FMCW Radar ARMA Reconstruction for Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Radar interference in automotive applications, such as Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS), prevents accurate detection and estimation of target objects due to unwanted signals from external sources, leading to issues like spurious lobes and phase errors.

Innovation Solution

Employing an Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) model to identify and zero out interference-affected radar samples, and reconstruct them using information from previous frames, thereby mitigating interference and preserving signal integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional radar signal processing is used, then the system is simple to implement, but interference from external radar sources causes spurious lobes and phase errors that prevent accurate target detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection accuracyVSAvoidradar interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies spectral estimation techniques to analyze the interference signal itself, extracting its characteristics (frequency, amplitude, phase) to then synthesize a cancellation signal. By studying the harmful interference in detail, the system converts our understanding of the interference into a beneficial cancellation mechanism that removes the spurious lobes and phase errors from the target detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Measurement precision

If interference cancellation techniques are applied, then target detection accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget detection accuracyVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional time-domain interference cancellation methods with frequency-domain spectral estimation techniques. By transforming the signal processing approach to the frequency domain using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and applying spectral analysis, the system achieves more efficient interference characterization and cancellation with reduced computational burden compared to time-domain adaptive filtering methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple radar frames are processed to mitigate interference, then detection robustness improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection robustnessVSAvoidsignal processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs spectral estimation and interference characterization on previous radar frames before the actual target detection occurs. By pre-processing and storing the interference signal characteristics from historical frames, the system has the cancellation parameters ready when new frames arrive, enabling rapid interference removal without re-processing the entire signal chain for each frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12392863B2Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) radar interference mitigation using an Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) model
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 NXP USA INC
  • US12392863B2 patent drawing
  • US12392863B2 patent drawing
  • US12392863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for mitigating interference in Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) radars using an Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) model are described. In an illustrative, non-limiting embodiment, a device includes a processor and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the device to: receive a first frame captured by a radar; receive a second frame, captured after the first frame, by the radar; and reconstruct zeroed samples in the second frame with information obtained from the first frame to mitigate interference in the second frame caused by another radar.