Rigid Polymeric Foam Board Curing and Cooling Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing rigid polymeric insulating foam boards face challenges in optimizing production rates, reducing raw material and labor costs, and minimizing reject rates while maintaining quality.

Innovation Solution

The method involves preheating the base facer on a heated bed before applying liquid foam reactants, extending the residence time in the curing station, and incorporating a cooling station after cutting to ensure proper curing and surface finish, using a laminator to control foam expansion, and in-line trimming with rebated edges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the base facer is preheated and residence time in curing station is extended, then the foam board achieves proper curing and surface finish, but the production cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidproduction cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The base facer is preheated before the foam reactants are applied, preparing the surface in advance to facilitate proper foam curing and surface finish. This preliminary heating action ensures that when the foam is applied and cures, it achieves the desired surface quality without requiring excessive curing time later in the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the residence time parameter in the curing station to a specific minimum (at least 30 seconds) that balances adequate curing with production efficiency. By precisely controlling this time parameter and combining it with preheating, the process achieves proper surface finish while minimizing the total cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If liquid foam reactants are applied through separate nozzles in spaced-apart streams, then the foam expansion is controlled and surface finish is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish consistencyVSAvoidnozzle system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foam reactant application system is divided into multiple separate nozzles that deliver spaced-apart streams of reactants across the base facer. This segmentation allows each nozzle to be positioned and controlled independently, enabling precise control over foam expansion patterns and ensuring consistent surface finish across the entire board width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the base facer receive foam reactants from specifically positioned nozzles, creating locally optimized foam expansion. The spaced-apart streams are arranged to ensure uniform distribution and consistent surface finish in different areas of the board, with each nozzle zone tailored to its specific location requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If the foam board is cooled after cutting, then the foam structure stabilizes and handling is improved, but the production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam structure stabilityVSAvoidcooling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling process is implemented as a continuous operation that begins immediately after cutting without interruption. The foam boards are conveyed through the cooling station where they are continuously cooled, allowing the process to proceed without stopping the production line. This continuous cooling stabilizes the foam structure while maintaining production flow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances production efficiency, reduces material costs, minimizes rejects, and achieves a consistent surface finish and robust foam structure, ensuring effective curing and handling of the foam boards.

Implementation Method 1

the base facer is heated by leading the base facer over a heated bed prior to laying down of liquid foam reactants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

leading the sandwich thus formed into an oven; leading the foam board from the oven through a foam curing station

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCuring: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

cooling the cut lengths of foam board by leading them through a cooling station

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP1790451B1Manufacturing a rigid polymeric insulating foam board
Publication Date: 2012.06.20 KINGSPAN HLDG (IRL) LTD
  • EP1790451B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1790451B1 patent drawingFigure 2~6

AI summary

A method for manufacturing a rigid polymeric insulating foam board comprises leading a base facer 1 to a lay-down area 5, laying liquid foam reactants 6 onto the base facer 1, and leading an upper facer 2 over the foam reactants. The sandwich thus formed is led into an oven 10 and then through a foam curing station, the residence time in the curing station being at least 30 seconds. The cured foam board is cut to length and the cut lengths of foam board are cooled prior to in-line trimming the side edges of the foam board.