Foam Dart Safety Cap Deformation Impact Force Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional foam darts lack effective safety mechanisms to reduce impact force upon collision, potentially causing discomfort or injury, especially when targeting human subjects.

Innovation Solution

A foam dart design featuring a safety cap with a deformable head portion and a mounting base, where the cap is made of a resilient material with a Shore A durometer between 50 and 80, capable of collapsing inwardly upon impact, forming an interior fluid path that reduces the impact force and allows for fluid expulsion, thereby distributing the force and minimizing discomfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a conventional foam dart is used, then the dart structure is simple, but the impact force upon collision is high causing discomfort or injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact forceVSAvoiddart structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dart head is segmented into multiple functional components: a deformable cap made of resilient material (Shore A durometer 50-80), an interior post, and a mounting base. This segmentation allows each component to perform a specific function in reducing impact force while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The deformable cap is designed with cushioning properties beforehand, using resilient material that can deform upon impact. The cap's ability to collapse inwardly toward the interior chamber is pre-engineered to absorb impact energy, providing cushioning before the actual collision occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If a deformable cap is added to reduce impact force, then the safety is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cap is manufactured with specific material parameters (Shore A durometer between 50 and 80, preferably 55-75, most preferably 60) to achieve the desired deformability and safety characteristics. This parameter-based approach allows for consistent manufacturing of safety-critical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The dart employs composite construction with the cap made of resilient material (such as thermoplastic elastomer, thermoplastic rubber, polyvinyl chloride, styrene-butadiene-styrene, or ethylene-vinyl acetate) combined with the foam body and rigid mounting base, creating a multi-material system that balances safety and manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the cap is made softer to reduce impact, then the comfort is improved, but the structural strength decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovediscomfortVSAvoidcap strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Different parts of the dart have different material properties optimized for their specific functions: the cap is made softer (Shore A 50-80) for comfort and impact reduction, while the mounting base and stem maintain higher strength for structural integrity and secure attachment to the foam body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The cap transitions from a rigid state during normal handling to a dynamic, deformable state during impact. The resilient material allows the cap to dynamically adjust its stiffness based on the applied force, being soft during normal use but providing controlled resistance during collision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The safety cap effectively reduces the impact force upon collision, minimizing discomfort and injury by transforming the normal force into motion within the cap and body, allowing it to return to its pre-collapsed state, and absorbing energy through friction and vibration, ensuring a safer and more controlled impact.

Implementation Method 1

configured to collapse inwardly toward the interior chamber upon impact with a target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

absorbing energy through friction and vibration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

absorbing energy through friction and vibration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 4

comprises a resilient material configured to return to a pre-impact condition following an impact with a target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9285194B2Foam dart having a safety cap
Publication Date: 2016.03.15 EASEBON SERVICES
  • US9285194B2 patent drawing
  • US9285194B2 patent drawing
  • US9285194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dart is disclosed that may comprise an elongate dart body, a base, and a cap. The elongate dart body may have a first end, a second end, and an interior cavity, which can be a bore. The base may include a mount and a stem inserted into the interior bore of the dart body at the first end of the dart. The cap may be attached to the base and may have a flexible, substantially bulbous-shaped head portion and an interior post so that the head portion may be configured to deform upon an impact.