Stationary Foam Filter for Gas Turbine Oil Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centrifugal oil separators in gas turbine aircraft engines require high rotation speeds to function properly, leading to significant pressure drops and increased compressor take-off pressure, which is detrimental to engine performance and results in overconsumption of oil, pollution, and additional costs due to excessive air flow during non-idling phases.

Innovation Solution

A non-rotating, compact filtering device with a stream flow channel and a collecting channel configuration that allows a lower flow rate in the collecting channel than in the flow channel, utilizing a baffle with partitions and particle suction means to separate oil from air, reducing pressure drops and optimizing integration within the turbomachine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If centrifugal oil separators rotate at high speeds to function properly, then oil separation efficiency is improved, but pressure drops increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil separation efficiencyVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the rotating mechanical centrifugal separation system with a stationary filtration system using foam media. The oil separation function is achieved through the filtering action of the foam material rather than through rotational centrifugal force, thereby eliminating the need for high-speed rotation and the associated pressure drops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential function of oil separation from the rotating centrifugal mechanism and implements it through a stationary foam filter. By taking out the rotation requirement, the system achieves oil separation without the harmful pressure drops associated with high-speed rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If compressor take-off pressure is increased to compensate for pressure drops, then oil separator function is maintained, but engine performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil separator functionVSAvoidengine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing the centrifugal rotation system with a stationary foam filter, the patent eliminates the need to increase compressor take-off pressure. The foam filter maintains oil separation function through its filtering mechanism rather than through pressure-driven centrifugal separation, thus preserving engine performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If air flow through seals is increased to ensure tight sealing, then enclosure sealing is improved, but oil consumption increases due to overcooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosure sealingVSAvoidoil consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters of the oil separation system by using a stationary foam filter instead of a rotating centrifugal separator. This parameter change allows for optimized air flow control through the seals, ensuring adequate sealing while preventing excessive air flow that would cause overcooling and increased oil consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If centrifugal oil separators are integrated into turbomachine, then oil separation is achieved, but device complexity increases due to rotating parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil separation capabilityVSAvoidrotating parts integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the rotation component from the oil separation system, leaving only a stationary foam filter. This extraction of the rotating mechanism simplifies the device integration into the turbomachine, eliminating the complexity associated with rotating parts while maintaining oil separation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the complex rotating centrifugal mechanism with a simple stationary foam filter. This substitution dramatically reduces device complexity and facilitates easier integration into the turbomachine structure without sacrificing oil separation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively separates oil from air without rotating parts, reducing pressure drops and enabling efficient integration into turbine engines, optimizing air flow and reducing oil consumption, thereby improving engine performance and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

particles flow obstacles are formed in the flow channel downstream of the upstream opening of the collecting channel, the particles flow obstacles comprising a baffle mounted across the flow channel, the baffle comprising several partitions formed successively across the flow channel and comprising respective non-aligned openings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

particle suction means are arranged in the collecting channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentEP3131656B1Filtering of a flow of gas/particles
Publication Date: 2019.10.30 SAFRAN TRANSMISSION SYST
  • EP3131656B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3131656B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a device for filtering a flow of gas conveying liquid or solid particles in a flow channel (12). According to the invention, the particles are imparted a speed that is high enough to project same by inertia into the opening (32) of a recovery channel (14) formed inside the flow channel, while the gas from the flow bypasses said opening due to a specific configuration of the flow conditions of a perfect fluid in the flow channel and in the collection channel.