Foamable 3D-Printed Bone Implants With Patient-Matched Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current orthopedic implants lack patient specificity and biological interaction, often resulting in issues such as stress shielding, bone resorption, and poor osseointegration due to mismatched modulus of elasticity, and are non-biodegradable, necessitating subsequent surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

A method for 3D printing patient-specific bone implants using a foamable thermoplastic composition comprising bioactive agents and chemical foaming agents, adjusting the 3D printing temperature to achieve varying densities and mechanical properties that match the patient's bone structure, utilizing FDM 3D printing for improved flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional orthopedic implants are used, then structural support is provided, but patient specificity and biological interaction are lacking, resulting in stress shielding, bone resorption, and poor osseointegration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient specificityVSAvoidosseointegration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the density and material composition at different locations within the implant structure. The 3D printing process enables region-specific control of porosity and mechanical properties to match the patient's bone structure, improving both adaptability and osseointegration simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials combining thermoplastic polymers with bioactive agents and chemical foaming agents. This composite approach enables the implant to provide structural support while simultaneously promoting bone growth and achieving patient-specific mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Duration of action of stationary object

If non-biodegradable materials are used for implants, then structural durability is maintained, but subsequent surgical procedures are required for removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant durabilityVSAvoidneed for removal surgery
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by selecting thermoplastic materials with specific degradation characteristics. The implant can be designed with controlled biodegradation rates that match bone regeneration, allowing temporary structural support without requiring removal surgery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent embraces the concept of temporary implants by using biodegradable thermoplastic materials. The implant serves its structural purpose during bone healing and then naturally degrades, eliminating the need for removal procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform density implants are produced, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but mismatched modulus of elasticity occurs relative to patient bone structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmodulus of elasticity matching
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing variable density and material distribution throughout the implant structure. The 3D printing process enables dynamic adjustment of mechanical properties at different locations to match the patient's bone modulus of elasticity while maintaining manufacturing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces implants with improved interaction and regeneration by mirroring the patient's bone density and structure, reducing negative impacts on surrounding tissues and eliminating the need for subsequent surgeries.

Implementation Method 1

between about 0.5% and about 10% chemical foaming agent by weight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical foaming: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 2

causing, by the computing hardware, a 3D printer to form the patient-specific bone implant from the 3D image using the thermoplastic polymer by modifying a 3D printing temperature of the 3D printer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

The 3D printer comprises a heating element and a cooling element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS12539672B2Foamable thermoplastic compositions for 3D printing
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 ROSE DANIEL TODD
  • US12539672B2 patent drawing
  • US12539672B2 patent drawing
  • US12539672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for 3D printing a patient-specific bone implant having variable density, in various aspects, comprises: (1) providing a thermoplastic polymer composition comprising: (A) between about 20% and about 50% bioactive agent by weight; (B) between about 0.5% and about 10% chemical foaming agent by weight; and (C) balance structural polymer by weight; (2) receiving, by computing hardware, a scan of a bone, the scan comprising at least a 3D image of the bone and radiodensity data for the bone; and (3) causing, by the computing hardware, a 3D printer to form the patient-specific bone implant from the 3D image using the thermoplastic polymer by modifying a 3D printing temperature of the 3D printer during printing of the patient-specific bone implant such that each portion of the patient-specific bone implant is produced at a temperature that corresponds to a desired density defined by the radiodensity data for the bone.