Foamable Thermoplastic Implants With Variable Density for Bone Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current orthopedic implants lack patient specificity and biological interaction, often resulting in issues such as stress shielding, bone resorption, and poor osseointegration due to mismatched modulus of elasticity, and require subsequent surgical procedures for removal.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing variable density 3D printed components using a foamable thermoplastic composition comprising biodegradable polymers and bioactive agents, adjusted through temperature control during 3D printing to match patient-specific bone density and structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional orthopedic implants are used, then structural support is provided, but stress shielding and bone resorption occur due to mismatched modulus of elasticity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodulus of elasticityVSAvoidstress shielding
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the density of the 3D printed implant across different regions to match the modulus of elasticity with surrounding bone tissue. By controlling printing parameters such as infill density and layer thickness, the implant achieves a graded modulus of elasticity that prevents stress shielding while maintaining structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating regions of varying density within the implant structure. Different portions of the implant have different material densities tailored to match the specific mechanical properties required at each location, allowing the implant to interact harmoniously with surrounding bone tissue and prevent stress shielding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If conventional orthopedic implants are used, then structural support is provided, but poor osseointegration occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidosseointegration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs porous materials by incorporating a controlled pore structure within the 3D printed implant. This porosity allows bone ingrowth and enhances osseointegration while maintaining adequate structural support. The pore size and distribution are optimized to facilitate bone cell attachment and proliferation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite materials by combining different polymer components or adding reinforcement phases to the base material. This creates a multi-phase structure that simultaneously provides structural support and promotes biological interaction, improving osseointegration while maintaining mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform density 3D printing is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but patient specificity and biological interaction are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting processVSAvoidpatient specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing variable density control during the 3D printing process. The printing parameters such as infill density, layer height, and printing speed are dynamically adjusted based on the specific patient anatomy and required mechanical properties, allowing customization while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Duration of action of stationary object

If biodegradable polymers are used, then subsequent removal surgeries are eliminated, but control over degradation rate and mechanical properties becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant retention timeVSAvoidmaterial composition
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining biodegradable polymers with varying degradation rates or adding non-biodegradable reinforcement phases. This allows control over the overall degradation profile and mechanical properties, eliminating removal surgery while managing the complexity of material behavior through careful composition design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enables patient-specific implants with improved biological interaction and reduced negative impacts on surrounding tissues by mirroring bone density and structure, eliminating the need for subsequent surgeries.

Implementation Method 1

adding a chemical foaming agent... heating and cooling elements cooperate to heat the thermoplastic polymer composition to the temperature that corresponds to the desired density... decomposition temperature of the chemical foaming agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical decomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 2

heating and cooling elements cooperate to heat the thermoplastic polymer composition to the temperature that corresponds to the desired density

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

heating and cooling elements cooperate to heat the thermoplastic polymer composition to the temperature that corresponds to the desired density

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP4507749B1Foamable thermoplastic compositions for 3D printing
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 ROSE DANIEL TODD
  • EP4507749B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4507749B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4507749B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A method for 3D printing a patient-specific bone implant having variable density, in various aspects, comprises: (1) providing a thermoplastic polymer composition comprising: (A) between about 20% and about 50% bioactive agent by weight; (B) between about 0.5% and about 10% chemical foaming agent by weight; and (C) balance structural polymer by weight; (2) receiving, by computing hardware, a scan of a bone, the scan comprising at least a 3D image of the bone and radiodensity data for the bone; and (3) causing, by the computing hardware, a 3D printer to form the patient-specific bone implant from the 3D image using the thermoplastic polymer by modifying a 3D printing temperature of the 3D printer during printing of the patient-specific bone implant such that each portion of the patient-specific bone implant is produced at a temperature that corresponds to a desired density defined by the radiodensity data for the bone.