Foaming device, apparatus and method therefor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing foaming devices for beverages, such as coffee, face challenges including high production costs, manufacturing difficulties due to small orifice dimensions, clogging issues, and hygiene problems due to complex tube structures that are hard to clean.

Innovation Solution

A foaming device with a fluid conduit comprising movable plates with baffles that create a turbulence-generating fluid flow path, allowing for easy cleaning and reduced production costs by simplifying the device structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If restrictors with very small orifices are used to generate fine foam, then high-quality crema is achieved, but manufacturing costs increase and manufacturing precision requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorifice dimension precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The single restrictor with small orifice is segmented into multiple restrictors with larger individual orifices. The patent describes using 'a plurality of restrictors (3) having a cross section in the form of a circle, a square, a triangle, a pentagon, a hexagon, an octagon, a decagon, a dodecagon, or another regular polygon' to replace the single small orifice, thereby achieving the same flow restriction effect while being easier to manufacture with standard tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a single-point restriction (small orifice) to a distributed multi-point restriction system. By arranging multiple restrictors in a specific pattern, the system achieves equivalent hydraulic resistance through spatial distribution, converting a precision-critical single dimension problem into a less critical multi-dimensional arrangement problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If restrictors with very small orifices are used to generate fine foam, then high-quality crema is achieved, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorifice dimension precisionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The single restrictor with small orifice is segmented into multiple restrictors with larger individual orifices. The patent describes using 'a plurality of restrictors (3) having a cross section in the form of a circle, a square, a triangle, a pentagon, a hexagon, an octagon, a decagon, a dodecagon, or another regular polygon' to replace the single small orifice, thereby achieving the same flow restriction effect while being easier to manufacture with standard tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs a design that can be manufactured more economically, potentially as a disposable or easily replaceable component. The simplified geometry of multiple larger restrictors compared to a single precision small orifice suggests a component that can be produced at lower cost, aligning with the principle of using cheaper objects when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If high fluid flow rate is used to create necessary pressure drop across orifices, then foam generation is effective, but the complexity of controlling flow increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow rateVSAvoidflow control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single high-flow requirement is segmented into multiple parallel flow paths through the plurality of restrictors. This distribution allows the system to achieve the necessary total pressure drop while operating at more manageable flow rates through each individual restrictor, reducing the complexity of flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If small orifices are used in foamers, then fine foam is generated, but clogging issues worsen due to dried residue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorifice dimension precisionVSAvoidclogging resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single small orifice is segmented into multiple larger orifices. The patent specifies 'a plurality of restrictors (3)' with various geometric shapes, distributing the flow across multiple pathways. This segmentation reduces the likelihood of complete clogging, as residue must block multiple separate openings simultaneously rather than a single critical point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each restrictor in the plurality can have different geometric shapes (circle, square, triangle, polygon), allowing optimization of local flow characteristics and residue accumulation patterns. This variation in local geometry helps prevent uniform clogging and allows some pathways to remain open even if others are partially blocked.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Manufacturing precision

If complex tube structures with beads are used for foaming, then foam quality is improved, but cleaning accessibility worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble size uniformityVSAvoidcleaning accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The complex internal tube structure is segmented and replaced with a simpler configuration using multiple restrictors. This segmentation allows for easier access and cleaning, as the flow path is more open and less convoluted compared to bead-filled tubes, while still achieving fine foam through the distributed restrictor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

6Manufacturing precision

If bead-in-tube foamers are used, then foam quality is improved, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble size uniformityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bead-in-tube system is segmented and replaced with a plurality of geometric restrictors. This eliminates the need for precise tube manufacturing with internal bead loading, using instead simpler geometric shapes that can be manufactured more economically while achieving similar or better flow distribution and foam quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs a design that can be manufactured more economically, potentially as a disposable or easily replaceable component. The simplified geometry of multiple restrictors compared to bead-filled tubes suggests a component that can be produced at lower cost, aligning with the principle of using cheaper objects when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

7Manufacturing precision

If bead-in-tube foamers are used, then foam quality is improved, but hygiene issues worsen due to difficult cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble size uniformityVSAvoidcleaning accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The complex internal tube structure is segmented and replaced with a simpler configuration using multiple restrictors. This segmentation allows for easier access and cleaning, as the flow path is more open and less convoluted compared to bead-filled tubes, while still achieving fine foam through the distributed restrictor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively generates high-quality foam with improved hygiene and reduced operational costs, suitable for various beverage preparations.

Implementation Method 1

baffles projecting into the cavity of the fluid conduit... create a turbulence-generating fluid flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS12342956B2Foaming device, apparatus and method therefor
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 KONINK DOUWE EGBERTS BV
  • US12342956B2 patent drawing
  • US12342956B2 patent drawing
  • US12342956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A foaming device comprising a fluid inlet, a fluid outlet spaced apart from said fluid inlet and a fluid conduit extending from said fluid inlet to said fluid outlet, the fluid conduit defining a cavity characterised in that said fluid conduit comprises first and second plates at least one of which comprises a plurality of baffles projecting into the cavity of the fluid conduit, and wherein at least one plate is movable with respect to the other to vary the distance between said plates.