Focus Measurement Model Calibration via Wafer Offset Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current focus measurement models based on FEM wafers suffer from scanner focus position ambiguities due to process variations, leading to large systematic errors in focus and dose measurements, with accuracy limited to around 4-5 nm.

Innovation Solution

The method involves printing multiple wafers with predefined focus offsets and measuring signals across sites to quantify focus inaccuracy by comparing signals, using a model-less approach that reduces ambiguity in scanner focus positions to below 2-3 nm by averaging systematic variations across wafers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If FEM wafers with predefined focus positions are used for model calibration, then focus and dose measurement can be performed, but scanner focus position ambiguities due to process variations cause large systematic errors limiting accuracy to 4-5 nm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus measurement accuracyVSAvoidscanner focus position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the measurement process into two independent stages: (1) measuring process variations on product wafers to create a variation map, and (2) using this map to correct focus position measurements on FEM wafers. This segmentation allows the systematic errors to be identified and corrected separately, improving measurement accuracy beyond the original 4-5 nm limitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a copy of the process variation characteristics by measuring product wafers and generating a variation map that replicates the systematic errors. This copied information is then applied to correct the FEM wafer measurements, eliminating the need to directly measure absolute focus positions and achieving sub-2nm accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If random FEM is used to reduce correlation between focus/dose characteristics and process variations, then measurement reliability improves, but model calibration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus measurement reliabilityVSAvoidmodel calibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex random FEM approach with a systematic correction method using product wafer measurements. Instead of randomly distributing focus positions to reduce correlation, the patent uses actual measured process variations from product wafers to correct the measurements, simplifying the calibration process while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9841689B1Approach for model calibration used for focus and dose measurement
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 KLA CORP
  • US9841689B1 patent drawing
  • US9841689B1 patent drawing
  • US9841689B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided that comprises printing FEM wafers having different predefined focus offsets and multiple corresponding sites, measuring signals from the sites, and quantifying a focus inaccuracy by comparing the measured signals from the corresponding sites across the wafers.