Focus Tracking Control After Manual Focus in Imaging Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing imaging systems burden users with manual focus operations, especially in one-man operations, leading to momentary time lags and difficulty in adjusting focus, angle of view, and exposure simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

An imaging apparatus that senses the termination of a manual focus operation based on a non-operation state, sets the in-focus region as a tracking target, and initiates auto focus control, reducing user burden by automatically switching to tracking AF mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual focus operation is used, then focus adjustment precision is improved, but operation burden and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus adjustment precisionVSAvoidoperation burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of the in-focus region during manual focus operation, and automatically sets this region as the tracking target before the user completes the focus adjustment. This preliminary action prepares the system for automatic tracking, reducing the user's subsequent operation burden while maintaining precise focus control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the autofocus mechanism to serve itself by automatically detecting the in-focus region during manual operation and using it as the tracking target. Once the user completes manual focus adjustment, the system autonomously switches to tracking autofocus mode, allowing the focus system to maintain itself without continuous user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual focus operation is used, then focus control flexibility is improved, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefocus control flexibilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between manual focus mode and automatic tracking mode based on the user's operational state. During manual focus adjustment, the system remains in manual mode to provide flexibility; once adjustment is complete (detected via non-operation state timing), it automatically transitions to tracking mode to maintain focus on moving subjects, thereby improving operational efficiency without sacrificing control flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the user by detecting the termination of manual focus operation through timing the non-operation state. This feedback mechanism automatically triggers the switch to tracking mode, allowing the system to adapt its behavior based on user actions and improve overall operational efficiency while maintaining focus control flexibility when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automatic tracking mode is activated, then operational efficiency is improved, but manual control capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidmanual control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic switching between manual and automatic tracking modes based on detected user operations. When the user performs focus adjustment, the system operates in manual mode; when no operation is detected for a predetermined time, it switches to automatic tracking mode. This periodic action allows the system to maintain manual control capability when needed while achieving operational efficiency during automatic tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the detection of non-operation state timing as an intermediary mechanism to mediate between manual control and automatic tracking. This intermediary detection method determines when to switch modes, ensuring that manual control capability is preserved when the user is actively adjusting focus, while automatic tracking efficiency is achieved when the user has completed adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If focus operation is continuously monitored, then responsiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously monitoring all focus parameters, the system performs partial monitoring by detecting only the termination state of manual focus operation through timing the non-operation state. This partial action approach achieves sufficient responsiveness to switch to automatic tracking mode without implementing complex continuous monitoring of all focus-related variables, thereby maintaining relatively simple system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12470818B2Imaging apparatus, imaging control method, and imaging control program with modes for focus control and tracking processing
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US12470818B2 patent drawing
  • US12470818B2 patent drawing
  • US12470818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imaging apparatus includes an imaging optical system, an imaging element, and a processor, in which, in a first focus mode, the processor outputs moving image data captured by the imaging element via the imaging optical system to a display destination, detects an in-focus region in an image represented by the moving image data based on the moving image data, senses, in a case where a focus operation is performed, a termination of the focus operation based on a time related to the focus operation, sets, in a case where the termination of the focus operation is sensed, a subject present in the in-focus region as a tracking target to continuously perform tracking processing and auto focus control, and terminates, in a case where the focus operation is performed again after the tracking processing and the auto focus control are started, the tracking processing and the auto focus control.