Focused Blind Deconvolution for Unique Response Function Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blind deconvolution techniques face significant non-uniqueness issues, making it difficult to accurately recover response functions and source signals due to multiple possible estimated response functions that, when convolved, result in the recorded signal.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of focused blind deconvolution methods using constraints that maximize the whiteness and front-loading of response functions, allowing for the recovery of system response functions without prior assumptions about the source signal or system physics, through a two-step optimization process involving focused blind interferometric deconvolution and phase retrieval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional blind deconvolution techniques are used, then the method can process measured signals, but the response function estimation is non-unique and inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse function estimation accuracyVSAvoiduniqueness of solution
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the deconvolution problem into the frequency domain using spectral analysis. By working with spectra instead of time-domain signals directly, the method converts the non-unique time-domain deconvolution into a unique frequency-domain solution, resolving the ambiguity in response function estimation while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical signal processing approach with a mathematical spectral analysis approach. Instead of using traditional time-domain deconvolution algorithms that suffer from non-uniqueness, the invention uses spectral factorization and cross-spectral density methods to obtain unique and accurate response function estimates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If multiple possible estimated response functions are considered, then the recorded signal can be reproduced, but the actual system response cannot be uniquely identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about actual response functionVSAvoidresponse function identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms through iterative spectral factorization processes. The method continuously refines the response function estimate by comparing predicted and actual spectral characteristics, using the differences to adjust and improve the estimation until convergence is achieved, thereby recovering the actual response function information that would otherwise be lost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing the measured signals to compute spectral estimates and cross-spectral densities before performing the actual deconvolution. This preliminary spectral analysis prepares the data in a transformed domain where the response function can be uniquely identified, preventing information loss before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional deconvolution methods are used without constraints, then the processing is simpler, but the results are ambiguous and imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeconvolution process complexityVSAvoidresponse function recovery precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the deconvolution process into distinct sequential steps: spectral estimation, spectral factorization, and inverse transformation. By dividing the complex deconvolution problem into these manageable segments, the method achieves precise response function recovery while keeping each individual step computationally simple and well-defined.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10979254B2Systems and methods for focused blind deconvolution
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US10979254B2 patent drawing
  • US10979254B2 patent drawing
  • US10979254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for performing focused blind deconvolution of signals received by a plurality of sensors are disclosed. In some embodiments, this may include determining a cross-correlation of first and second signals, obtaining a cross-correlation of a first response function and a second response function based on the cross-correlation of the first and second signals and subject to a first constraint that the first and second response functions are maximally white, and obtaining the first and second response functions based on the cross-correlation of the first and second response functions and subject to a second constraint that the first and second response functions are maximally front-loaded.