Foil Bag Handle and Reclosure Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing film bags with side gussets and reclosures face challenges in balancing material costs, load-bearing capacity, and ease of handling, particularly when designed for large volumes or heavy fillings, as they often require additional foil strips or prefabricated handles, and the removal opening may not be large enough for easy access.

Innovation Solution

A film bag design where the front walls and side folds extend along the entire longitudinal edge, with a reclosure attached to the first front wall using connection lugs and a window-shaped removal area, allowing easy access and distribution of weight across both front walls and side folds, and featuring a carrying handle formed by simple punching or material separation, which enhances stability and handling without additional material costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a carrying handle is added to a film bag with side gussets and reclosure, then ease of handling is improved, but device complexity and material costs increase due to requiring additional foil strips or prefabricated handle arrangements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of handlingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The carrying handle is integrated directly into the front wall structure of the bag by forming a recess or groove in the film material itself, eliminating the need for separate handle components. This merging of functions allows the front wall to simultaneously provide structural support and handle functionality, reducing both material costs and device complexity while maintaining ease of handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If the reclosure is positioned close to the top edge of the bag, then ease of operation for pouring is improved, but reliability decreases due to risk of accidental opening or damage before use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of pouringVSAvoidprotection from accidental opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reclosure is positioned near the top edge to facilitate easy pouring operations, but protective seals or coverings are pre-applied to the reclosure mechanism. These protective elements remain in place until the bag is ready for use, preventing accidental opening or damage during storage and transport, thus maintaining both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the removal opening is made large for easy access, then ease of operation is improved, but strength of the front wall is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of accessVSAvoidstrength of front wall
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The front wall is designed with a large removal opening to enable easy access to contents, but the opening is strategically positioned and shaped to minimize structural compromise. Reinforcement elements or strategic placement of the opening away from critical load-bearing areas maintain the overall strength of the front wall while providing sufficient access for scooping and pouring operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides improved functional properties with reduced material costs, enhanced stability, and easy handling, allowing for efficient pouring and scooping of contents while maintaining structural integrity even after opening, with a large removal opening and secure closure.

Implementation Method 1

a reclosure (3) with reclosure strips (15) that lock together, with the reclosure (3) being fastened to the first front wall (1a) with both connecting lugs (16)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastener: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

the snap-in strip of one sliders for connecting and disconnecting are overlapped

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastener: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

such gusset bags can also be differentiated with regard to their manufacturing process. In this way, gusseted bags can be manufactured one after the other from a continuous web of material by folding and heat-sealing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat sealing: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3023350B1Front slider bag with stamp handle and blank for its formation
Publication Date: 2019.04.10 MONDI AG
  • EP3023350B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3023350B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3023350B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a foil bag with side gussets (2) and a resealable closure (3) attached to a first front wall (1a) on its inner side and accessible via a dispensing area (11). A carrying handle (7) is formed on a sealed head section (6) by simply cutting through the front walls (1a, 1b). The side gussets (2) extend from the bottom of the bag to the top edge along the entire longitudinal edges (9) of the bag. The resealable closure has interlocking closure strips, each with a connecting tab and a locking bar, the locking bars being able to be connected and disconnected by a slider. The invention also relates to a flattened, unfilled foil bag and a method for manufacturing the foil bag.