Foldable Basket With Integrated Partition Handle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing baskets for transporting food are rigid, occupying significant space when empty and costly, making them unsuitable for single-use disposal.

Innovation Solution

A folding basket design featuring a sheet with multiple folding lines, a handle extending into a partition that divides it into two housings, providing strength and reduced space occupation, with optional closing flaps and internal partitions for enhanced functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid baskets are used to ensure strength for transporting heavy products, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but space occupation increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidspace occupation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The basket transitions from a rigid structure to a dynamic foldable structure. The lateral surfaces are designed with folding lines that allow the basket to collapse into a compact form when empty, while maintaining structural integrity when loaded. This dynamic configuration enables the basket to adapt its volume based on usage state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The basket is segmented into multiple lateral surfaces connected by folding lines, creating a collapsible structure. The handle is also segmented and integrated with the partition through folding mechanisms, allowing the entire assembly to fold compactly while maintaining strength through the segmented structural design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If rigid baskets are used to ensure strength for transporting heavy products, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but cost increases making single-use disposal impossible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The basket is constructed from a single flexible sheet of material (cardboard or plastic) that is folded and assembled into the final structure. This eliminates the need for complex rigid components, metal fasteners, and multi-part assemblies, significantly reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining adequate strength for the intended application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The sheet is segmented into functional zones (lateral surfaces, bottom, handle, partition, closing flaps) that are interconnected through folding lines. This segmentation allows the entire basket to be formed from a single low-cost sheet without requiring expensive joining operations or additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the handle extends downwardly into a partition dividing the basket into two housings, then strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle strengthVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle and partition are merged into a single integrated structure formed from the same sheet. The handle extends downward and becomes part of the partition that divides the basket into two housings, eliminating the need for separate components and reducing overall structural complexity while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The partition serving as the handle also performs the dual function of dividing the basket into two separate housings. This multi-functional design element reduces the total number of components needed while providing both handle functionality and internal division for organizing contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If closing flaps are added to prevent accidental exit of products, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct containmentVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding complex latches or fasteners to secure the closing flaps, the design inverts the approach by making the flaps themselves the closing mechanism. The flaps are shaped and positioned to naturally cover the openings, relying on their own geometry rather than additional securing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The closing flaps serve multiple functions: they seal the openings to prevent product escape, and when provided with holes, they also allow insertion of tall items like bottles. This multi-functionality is achieved without adding separate mechanisms, keeping the structure simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2007648B1basket
Publication Date: 2010.08.04 GRUPO BDEB 2006 SERVICIOS EMPRESARIALES
  • EP2007648B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2007648B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2007648B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The basket of the present invention comprises a lateral surface, a bottom and a handle (12) , said basket being formed from at least a sheet provided with a plurality of folding lines, and it is characterized in that said handle extends downwardly into a partition (11) which divides the basket into two housings. Said partition (11) is preferably joined to the bottom of the basket. It is obtained a very light basket, and which occupies a reduced space if transported in its unfolded position, with a great strength and suitable to transport heavy products, such as bottles.