Foldable Box With Internal Magnet Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing foldable boxes are complex in construction and operation, requiring excessive panels, joints, and externally attached fastening means, which makes them difficult to unfold and stack efficiently, and they often deteriorate over time, limiting single-handed use and internal locking mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A foldable box design comprising two subassemblies of panels with predefined folds and connections, using magnets and an iron piece for internal locking, allowing for effortless folding and unfolding with minimal components, enabling single-handed operation and flat stacking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If externally attached fastening means are used to lock panels, then the box can be folded and locked, but the construction becomes complex and the flat configuration is not retained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking abilityVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes externally attached fastening means (hinges, covers, hooks, loops, zips) and extracts only the essential locking function, implementing it internally through a simplified panel interaction mechanism that locks the box flat without external components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The box structure itself provides the locking mechanism through its panel design, where the panels inherently lock each other in the flat configuration without requiring separate fastening components. The structure serves its own fastening function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple panels and joints are used to construct the box, then the box can be folded and unfolded, but the operation becomes time consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding capabilityVSAvoidoperation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The box is divided into essential panel segments (front, back, side panels) that are minimally connected through folds, allowing folding functionality while reducing the number of components and joints compared to traditional multi-panel constructions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functions are merged into the panel structure itself - the panels provide both the enclosure walls and the folding hinges through integrated fold lines, eliminating separate joint components and simplifying the unfolding operation to a single action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If externally located fastening means are used, then the panels can be locked, but the box cannot be stacked flat efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel lockingVSAvoidstacking efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

External fastening components that protrude from the box surface are removed, allowing the box to lie completely flat when closed. The locking mechanism is internalized within the panel structure, enabling efficient stacking without external obstacles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If traditional locking means are attached individually to panel sections, then the box can be locked, but the locking ability deteriorates over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking functionVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is merged into the inherent structural geometry of the panel assembly rather than being implemented through separate attached components. This integration eliminates wear points associated with individual fasteners and creates a durable, maintenance-free locking system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The panel structure itself provides the locking mechanism through its geometric configuration, eliminating the need for separate locking components that can deteriorate. The structure locks itself through its own form

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Ease of operation

If the box structure is designed for two-handed operation, then the folding mechanism can be operated, but single-handed use is not possible especially for persons with physical limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding operationVSAvoidsingle-handed usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple operational actions (unfolding, opening, locking) are merged into a single integrated motion sequence that can be initiated and completed with one hand. The panel geometry is designed so that lifting and spreading actions naturally progress through the unfolding sequence without requiring separate manual interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design simplifies the construction and operation of foldable boxes by using internal magnets and an iron piece for locking, ensuring easy conversion between flat and three-dimensional configurations, enhancing durability and usability, particularly for single-handed use and efficient stacking.

Implementation Method 1

The box includes a combination of magnets and an iron piece for locking it flat, as well as, in three dimensional configurations.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUSRE46563E1Foldable box
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 PAPILLION RIBBON & BOW
  • USRE46563E1 patent drawing
  • USRE46563E1 patent drawing
  • USRE46563E1 patent drawing

AI summary

A reusable foldable box is disclosed that has a first flat configuration and a second three dimensional configuration. The box consists of a first set and a set of panels that are assembled to form the foldable box. The first set of panels includes at least six panels that are foldably coupled in a predefined sequence. The first set includes a top panel, bottom panel, a pair of side panels, a lip panel and a securing panel. The first set of panels forms a single piece construction to which the side panels of the second set of panels are coupled with triangular inward connectors.