Foldable Cover Window Structure for Impact-Resistant Displays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flexible display devices face challenges in maintaining reliability and stability as they deform, particularly in reducing thickness differences between components to enhance impact resistance and facilitate sliding or folding operations.

Innovation Solution

A display device design featuring a cover window with a first cover part made of crystallized glass overlapping non-deformation parts and a second cover part made of amorphous glass overlapping deformation parts, along with a coating layer and a third cover part with a slope, where the crystallized glass is formed by laser irradiation and the amorphous glass is etched to achieve reduced thickness differences and improved impact resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a uniform thick cover window is used across the entire display device, then impact resistance is improved, but flexibility and deformability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoiddeformability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cover window employs different glass types in different regions: crystallized glass with higher strength and thickness in non-deformation areas for impact resistance, and amorphous glass with lower strength and thickness in deformation areas for flexibility. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between overall strength and local deformability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If crystallized glass is used in the cover window, then mechanical strength is improved, but thickness difference with deformation parts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidthickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

Crystallized glass is selectively applied only in non-deformation areas where high strength is needed, while amorphous glass is used in deformation areas. This localized material selection achieves mechanical strength improvement without creating excessive thickness differences across the entire cover window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the thickness of crystallized glass in non-deformation areas to be within 10-100 μm, and adjusts the thickness of amorphous glass in deformation areas to maintain overall thickness uniformity. This parameter control resolves the thickness difference issue while preserving the mechanical strength benefits of crystallized glass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the cover window is made thinner to facilitate folding, then deformability is improved, but impact resistance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding capabilityVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The cover window uses amorphous glass with thinner thickness in deformation areas to enable folding, while crystallized glass with appropriate thickness in non-deformation areas maintains impact resistance. This spatial differentiation allows the device to fold without compromising overall protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If different glass types are used in different regions, then mechanical properties are optimized, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cover window is divided into distinct regions (deformation and non-deformation areas) with different glass materials. This segmentation allows each region to have optimized mechanical properties while the overall structure remains manageable through clear zone definition and specialized material application in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the mechanical strength and impact resistance of the display device while allowing for easy sliding and folding operations, maintaining high optical characteristics and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

radiating laser to the preliminary first cover part to form the first cover part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser irradiation: Laser

Implementation Method 2

radiating laser to the amorphous glass to form the crystallized glass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 3

etching the preliminary second cover part to form the second cover part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Data Source

PatentUS20240414982A1Display device and method for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US20240414982A1 patent drawing
  • US20240414982A1 patent drawing
  • US20240414982A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A display device includes a display panel and a cover window disposed on the display panel. The display panel includes a deformation part, which is curvedly deformable, and a non-deformation part adjacent to the deformation part. The cover window includes a first cover part overlapping the non-deformation part and including crystallized glass, and a second cover part overlapping the deformation part and not including the crystallized glass.