Foldable Display Bottom Plate With Metal-Plastic Support Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flexible display devices face challenges in maintaining foldability and durability while minimizing weight and deformation under stress.

Innovation Solution

A display device design incorporating a bottom plate with a first area made of metal for foldability and a second area made of plastic for reduced weight, connected through protrusions to enhance the connecting force and minimize deformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the entire bottom plate is made of metal material, then the structural strength and foldability are improved, but the total weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidtotal weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom plate is divided into different material regions: a first region with metal material providing structural strength and foldability, and a second region with plastic material reducing weight. This local differentiation allows each area to have properties optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom plate uses composite construction with both metal and plastic materials integrated into a single structure. The metal portion provides necessary strength and flexibility for folding, while the plastic portion reduces overall weight, achieving a balance between these conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Weight of stationary object

If the bottom plate is made of lightweight plastic material, then the total weight is reduced, but the structural strength and resistance to deformation decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal weightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom plate is divided into different material regions: a first region with metal material providing structural strength and foldability, and a second region with plastic material reducing weight. This local differentiation allows each area to have properties optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom plate uses composite construction with both metal and plastic materials integrated into a single structure. The metal portion provides necessary strength and flexibility for folding, while the plastic portion reduces overall weight, achieving a balance between these conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If the bottom plate is made of a single material, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but the ability to suppress deformation under stress is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidresistance to deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom plate is divided into different material regions: a first region with metal material providing structural strength and foldability, and a second region with plastic material reducing weight. This local differentiation allows each area to have properties optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The bottom plate uses composite construction with both metal and plastic materials integrated into a single structure. The metal portion provides necessary strength and flexibility for folding, while the plastic portion reduces overall weight, achieving a balance between these conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Device complexity

If the connecting area between different material regions is reduced, then the device complexity is reduced, but the connecting force and structural integrity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexityVSAvoidconnecting force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

A protrusion structure extends in the thickness direction to increase the connecting surface area between the metal and plastic regions. This dimensional approach allows the connection to be strengthened without complicating the planar layout or increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12468338B2Display device
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 LG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US12468338B2 patent drawing
  • US12468338B2 patent drawing
  • US12468338B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A display device includes a folding area and a non-folding area. The display device further includes a display panel and a bottom plate disposed under the display panel to support the display panel. The bottom plate may include different materials. The bottom plate may also include a first area overlapping the folding area of the display device and a second area overlapping the non-folding area of the display device. The first area includes a pattern part and a non-pattern part between the pattern part and the second area.