Foldable Display Reinforcing Board for Central Crease Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing foldable display apparatuses suffer from creasing issues due to repeated folding, particularly in the central portion where pressure-sensitive adhesives and films are prone to deformation.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcing board with a central portion having a reduced thickness and reinforcement members arranged such that their height decreases linearly away from the center, with the centermost member having the greatest height, and featuring stripe patterns with alternating openings and blocking portions to enhance folding performance while preventing creasing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the reinforcing layer has uniform thickness, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the central portion cannot effectively prevent creasing of the pressure sensitive adhesive and film during folding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrease prevention capabilityVSAvoidreinforcing layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing layer is designed with non-uniform thickness, where the central portion has a first thickness and the edge portion has a second thickness greater than the first thickness. This local variation in thickness provides enhanced support exactly where creasing occurs during folding, while maintaining simplicity in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing layer is divided into distinct regions: a central portion and an edge portion with different thicknesses. This segmentation allows each region to serve its specific function - the central portion prevents creasing while the edge portion provides structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If reinforcement members are added to prevent creasing, then the structural support is improved, but the weight and complexity of the reinforcing board increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity during foldingVSAvoidweight of reinforcing board
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement members have a plate-like structure with relatively small thickness compared to their lateral dimensions. This thin-film approach provides the necessary structural support while minimizing the addition of weight to the foldable display apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Adaptability or versatility

If the central portion of the reinforcing layer is made thinner, then the flexibility during folding is improved, but the overall strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding flexibilityVSAvoidoverall structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcing layer has different thicknesses in different regions: the central portion is thinner to allow flexibility during folding, while the edge portion is thicker to maintain overall structural strength. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between flexibility and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing layer is segmented into a central portion and an edge portion with different thickness characteristics. This segmentation enables the central area to be more flexible while the edge area provides structural reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12495482B2Reinforcing board and display apparatus having the same
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US12495482B2 patent drawing
  • US12495482B2 patent drawing
  • US12495482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reinforcing board includes a reinforcing layer that includes a central portion that is thinner than an edge portion, and a plurality of reinforcement members disposed on the central portion. A height of a reinforcement member disposed in a center of the central portion is greater than a height of a reinforcement member disposed in an outer side of the central portion.