Foldable Felt Planters Using Cut Patterns for Space Saving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current container structures for plants are limited by issues such as weight, durability, aesthetics, and space efficiency, as materials like stone, concrete, and terracotta are heavy and prone to breaking, while resin and plastic fade over time, and fiberglass can be expensive and wear out, lacking the ability to be folded or disassembled for space-saving storage.

Innovation Solution

The development of foldable forms made from durable and lightweight nonwoven materials, featuring specific patterns of cuts that allow the forms to transition between a planar and non-planar state, enabling the creation of aesthetically pleasing, space-efficient containers that can be folded into various shapes and sizes without the need for adhesives or extra materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional materials like stone, concrete, and terracotta are used for container structures, then sufficient stiffness and durability are achieved, but the containers become heavy and prone to chipping and breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestiffnessVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into multiple panels that can be folded together to form the complete structure. This segmentation allows the container to achieve sufficient stiffness through the folded geometry while using lighter-weight materials compared to traditional solid construction methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container transitions from a two-dimensional folded state to a three-dimensional structure through folding. This dimensional transformation enables the container to gain structural stiffness and volume while maintaining lightweight properties, as the strength comes from the folded geometry rather than material thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If traditional materials like stone, concrete, and terracotta are used for container structures, then sufficient stiffness is achieved, but the containers are prone to chipping and breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestiffnessVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from traditional heavy materials to lightweight fabric or flexible material. Despite the material change, sufficient structural stiffness is achieved through the folded geometry and panel configuration, while the new material provides improved durability by being resistant to chipping and breaking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If containers are made from rigid materials, then structural support for plants is achieved, but the containers occupy significant space when not in use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The container is designed to be dynamic rather than static, allowing it to transform between a three-dimensional usable state and a two-dimensional compact storage state. The folded construction enables the container to be collapsed flat for storage while maintaining structural integrity when assembled for plant support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The container is segmented into foldable panels that can be collapsed together for compact storage. This segmentation allows the container to reduce its volume significantly when not in use while maintaining the ability to provide structural support when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If fiberglass and metal are used for container structures, then durability and stiffness are improved, but the cost increases and the materials can wear and fray

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestiffnessVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses inexpensive fabric or flexible material that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed. While individual containers may have a shorter lifespan than expensive materials like fiberglass, the low cost of production and replacement makes them economically advantageous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The container combines fabric material with a folded structural design to achieve properties that neither component alone would provide. The fabric provides flexibility and resistance to degradation, while the folded geometry provides structural stiffness and shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11516972B2Felt planters and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 LIN HUIMIAO
  • US11516972B2 patent drawing
  • US11516972B2 patent drawing
  • US11516972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure includes foldable forms that are foldable between a first planar state and a second non-planar state. The form can include at least two sectors, each comprising first and second sub-sectors that each comprise a set of cuts. The set of cuts can include first through fourth cuts, where a portion of the form between the first cut, second cut, third cut, a theoretical line connecting the second and third cuts, and the edge forms a flap. The form can be folded, with the flaps received through the fourth cuts to make a container. The container can be usable as a planter.