Foldable Middle Frame Reinforcement Against Hinge Impact Collapse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional foldable electronic devices with inward-folding screens face issues of local collapse and deformation at the middle frame adjacent to the folding mechanism due to impact forces, necessitating high-strength materials that increase weight and manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A foldable electronic device design incorporating a reinforcement member with higher yield strength and/or micro Vickers hardness than the middle frame, strategically positioned to absorb impact forces, reducing the need for high-strength materials across the entire middle frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high-strength material is used to manufacture the entire middle frame, then impact resistance and deformation resistance are improved, but weight and manufacturing costs increase greatly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using high-strength material only for the reinforcement member at the specific location adjacent to the rotating shaft where impact forces occur, rather than using high-strength material for the entire middle frame. This localized application of high-strength material provides targeted impact resistance while keeping the overall weight low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The middle frame is segmented into different material zones: a reinforcement member made of high-strength material at the critical impact zone, and the rest of the middle frame made of lighter material. This segmentation allows each part to have optimized material properties for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If high-strength material is used to manufacture the entire middle frame, then deformation resistance is improved, but manufacturing costs increase greatly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

High-strength material is applied locally only where deformation resistance is critical (adjacent to the rotating shaft), rather than throughout the entire middle frame. This reduces the total amount of expensive high-strength material needed, thereby lowering manufacturing costs while maintaining adequate deformation resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The middle frame structure is segmented into a reinforcement member portion and a main body portion, with different material specifications for each segment. This allows cost-effective material selection for each part based on its functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If the middle frame structure is simplified without reinforcement, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but local collapse and deformation occur due to impact force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costsVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement member acts as an intermediary element between the folding mechanism's rotating shaft and the middle frame. It absorbs and distributes the impact forces generated during folding operations, protecting the middle frame from local collapse and deformation while maintaining overall structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement member is pre-installed at the critical location to cushion against future impact forces from the folding mechanism. This beforehand protective measure prevents damage before it occurs, ensuring reliability without requiring a complex overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP4693260A1Foldable electronic device and housing device
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • EP4693260A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP4693260A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4693260A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This application provides a foldable electronic device and a housing apparatus. A side portion that is of a first middle frame of the electronic device and that is close to a second middle frame is provided with a first mounting groove. A first groove end wall and a second groove end wall of the first mounting groove are disposed opposite to each other. A first groove side wall of the first mounting groove is connected between the first groove end wall and the second groove end wall. A first reinforcement member is fastened to the first groove end wall. A first end portion and a second end portion that are disposed opposite to each other are included in a length extension direction of a folding mechanism. A first stop block is disposed at the first end portion. When the electronic device is in a folded state, the first reinforcement member is located between the first groove side wall and the first stop block and abuts against the first stop block. Yield strength of the first reinforcement member is greater than yield strength of the first middle frame, and/or micro Vickers hardness of the first reinforcement member is greater than micro Vickers hardness of the first middle frame. The first reinforcement member can avoid a problem of local collapse of the first middle frame caused by collision between the first stop block and an adjacent part of the first middle frame.