Foldable Glass Cover Modules with Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flexible electronic devices face challenges in achieving optimal optical transparency, thermal stability, fatigue resistance, and puncture resistance, especially when folded, due to the limitations of traditional materials like metal foils and polymeric foils, and the complex stress states in glass-containing modules lead to delamination and cohesive failures.

Innovation Solution

The development of foldable electronic device modules with a glass-containing cover element, optimized through control of material properties, thicknesses, adhesives, and interlayers, which include a glass layer with compressive stress regions and tailored elastic moduli to enhance impact resistance, bending resistance, and puncture resistance, allowing for easier folding and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If glass substrates are manufactured to very low thickness levels (150 μm) to achieve flexibility, then flexibility and thinness are improved, but fatigue resistance and mechanical reliability upon bending deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethicknessVSAvoidfatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite structure consisting of a glass substrate combined with a polymeric foil layer and adhesive layers. This composite construction allows the glass to provide optical transparency and thermal stability while the polymeric foil contributes flexibility and fatigue resistance, resolving the contradiction between thinness and mechanical reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the thickness parameters of multiple layers including the glass substrate, polymeric foil, and adhesive layers. By carefully controlling these thickness parameters, the module achieves both flexibility for folding and sufficient mechanical strength to prevent fatigue failure during repeated bending cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple layers and adhesives are added to create glass-containing modules with electronic components, then functionality and integration are improved, but stress concentration and susceptibility to delamination failure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveintegrationVSAvoidresistance to delamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses adhesives with optimized mechanical properties that create a homogeneous stress distribution across the interface between layers. The adhesive composition and thickness are carefully controlled to ensure uniform bonding, reducing stress concentration points that would lead to delamination failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a multi-layer composite structure where each layer (glass substrate, polymeric foil, adhesives, electronic components) is specifically designed and selected to complement the others. The composite construction allows stress management across the entire module, preventing delamination while maintaining functional integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If traditional polymeric foils are used for flexibility, then ease of bending and impact resistance are improved, but optical transparency and thermal stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of bendingVSAvoidoptical transparency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure where a glass substrate provides superior optical transparency and thermal stability, while a polymeric foil layer contributes flexibility and ease of bending. The combination allows the module to achieve properties that neither material could provide alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional polymeric foils are used for flexibility, then low cost and impact resistance are improved, but thermal stability and hermeticity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidthermal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a glass substrate with superior thermal stability and hermeticity properties with a polymeric foil layer that provides cost-effectiveness and impact resistance. This composite approach allows the module to achieve thermal performance comparable to glass while maintaining cost advantages through the use of polymeric materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced impact resistance, reduced tensile stresses, and increased bending resistance, leading to improved mechanical reliability and manufacturability of foldable electronic devices, enabling them to withstand small bend radii and puncture without delamination or cohesive failures.

Implementation Method 1

a glass-containing cover element (50), optimized through control of material properties, thicknesses, adhesives, and interlayers, which include a glass layer with compressive stress regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressive stress:

Implementation Method 2

optimized through control of material properties, thicknesses, adhesives, and interlayers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

flexible electronic device substrate (60)... allowing for easier folding and reliability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexibility:

Implementation Method 4

The solution provides enhanced impact resistance, reduced tensile stresses, and increased bending resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress distribution:

Data Source

PatentEP3695445B1Foldable electronic device modules with impact and bend resistance
Publication Date: 2023.11.29 CORNING INC
  • EP3695445B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3695445B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3695445B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A foldable electronic device module includes: a glass-containing cover element having a thickness from about (25) µm to about (200) µm, an elastic modulus from about (20) to (140) GPa, and first and second primary surfaces; a stack comprising: (a) an interlayer having an elastic modulus from about (0.01) to (10) GPa and a thickness from about 50 to (200) µm, and (b) a flexible substrate having a thickness from about (100) to (200) µm; and a first adhesive joining the stack to the cover element, and comprising an elastic modulus from about (0.001) to (10) GPa and a thickness from about (5) to (25) µm. Further, the module comprises an impact resistance characterized by tensile stresses of less than about (4100) MPa and less than about (8300) MPa at the first and second primary surfaces of the cover element, respectively, upon an impact in a Pen Drop Test.