Foldable Paper-Barrier Insulated Bag for Recyclable Shipping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing insulated shipping containers are non-recyclable or non-compostable, leading to environmental waste and limited eco-friendly disposal options, while also being inefficient in terms of cost and material usage.

Innovation Solution

Development of recyclable or compostable insulation products with customizable insulation and cushioning properties, manufactured on-demand using machines that allow for flexible sizing and insulation qualities, reducing waste and shipping costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional insulated shipping containers are used, then insulation and cushioning properties are provided, but recyclability and compostability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsulation and cushioning propertiesVSAvoidenvironmental waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters from traditional non-recyclable insulation materials to recyclable and compostable alternatives such as molded fiber insulation and recycled foam. These material parameter changes maintain the required insulation and cushioning properties while eliminating environmental waste through recyclability and compostability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials that combine recyclable and compostable components to create insulation products meeting both performance and environmental requirements. The composite structure allows for maintained insulation and cushioning properties while enabling recyclability and compostability through biodegradable material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Duration of action of stationary object

If insulated shipping containers are designed for long-term use, then durability is improved, but manufacturing cost and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifespan of containerVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic design allowing the insulated containers to be collapsed and compressed into compact forms for storage and transport. This dynamic capability enables the containers to maintain durability and lifespan while significantly reducing material usage through compact storage and on-demand deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the insulation product into modular segments that can be assembled and disassembled. This segmentation allows for reduced material usage while maintaining durability, as the modular components can be reused and reconfigured without requiring excessive material consumption for long-term use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If insulated shipping containers are designed for limited lifespan, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but waste generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidwaste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables recovery and reuse of insulation materials through designed disassembly mechanisms. Even containers with limited lifespan can have their insulation materials recovered and reused, reducing waste generation while maintaining cost-effectiveness. The materials can be composted or recycled after use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The patent accepts the use of cost-effective, shorter-lifespan containers for certain applications while implementing compostable and recyclable materials. This approach reduces manufacturing costs for basic containers while minimizing waste through biological decomposition or material recovery rather than permanent disposal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Ease of operation

If insulation products are manufactured in advance, then availability is improved, but material waste and shipping costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavailability of insulation productsVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables preliminary preparation of insulation materials in compact, space-efficient forms that can be quickly deployed. Materials are pre-processed into ready-to-use configurations that minimize waste during storage and transport, while allowing on-demand assembly to reduce material waste compared to bulk pre-manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of insulation materials to compact, space-efficient forms that can be stored and transported with minimal waste. The materials are designed to expand or configure themselves upon deployment, reducing the need for bulk pre-manufacturing and associated material waste while maintaining availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260070730A1Insulated products and devices and methods for making the same
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 TEMPERPACK TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20260070730A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070730A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070730A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An insulating substrate may include one or more sections, one or more portions in each of the one or more sections, and one or more crease lines separating one or more of the section(s) and/or portion(s). The insulating substrate may be formed into an insulated bag through folding and/or creasing the crease line(s). The insulating substrate may include one or more paper barriers with a core layer disposed between the one or more paper barriers.