Foldable Magnetic Closure With Balanced Opening Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closure mechanisms for foldable electronic devices, such as laptops and tablets, require excessive force to open when a screen guard is present, affecting user accessibility, especially for individuals with disabilities, due to increased magnetic force needed to maintain the device in a closed position.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic closure system utilizing two pairs of magnets, where the first pair provides an attractive force to keep the device closed and the second pair offers a repelling force that counteracts the attraction as the device closes, with the second pair's pole size smaller than the first, ensuring balanced closure and easy opening regardless of the presence of a screen guard.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an increased closure force mechanism is used to compensate for screen guard presence, then the device can remain closed reliably, but the force required to open the device increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice remaining closedVSAvoidforce required to open
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic closure system is divided into two separate magnet pairs with distinct functions: a first magnet pair that provides attractive closure force to keep the device closed, and a second magnet pair that provides repulsive force to assist opening. This segmentation allows each magnet pair to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between reliable closure and easy opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second magnet pair acts as a magnetic counterweight that provides a repulsive force opposing the attractive force of the first magnet pair. This counteracting magnetic force reduces the net closure force that the user must overcome to open the device, while the first magnet pair ensures sufficient closure reliability when the device is closed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a screen guard is added to protect the screen, then screen protection is improved, but the closure mechanism effectiveness deteriorates due to increased distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreen protectionVSAvoidclosure mechanism effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The solution addresses the distance issue by introducing a second magnetic dimension through the repulsive magnet pair. The first magnet pair compensates for the increased distance caused by the screen guard by providing stronger attractive force, while the second magnet pair provides repulsive force that becomes significant only when the device is nearly closed, ensuring reliable closure regardless of screen guard presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If larger pole size magnets are used to increase closure force, then closure reliability improves, but the force curve becomes non-linear and opening becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure forceVSAvoidopening effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic closure system transitions from a static single-magnet design to a dynamic two-magnet-pair system where the net magnetic force changes dynamically as the device closes. As the gap decreases, the repulsive force from the second magnet pair increases, automatically adjusting the net closure force to provide strong holding at full closure while reducing the force barrier during the opening process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system maintains the device in a closed position with minimal effort and allows easy one-finger opening, providing flexibility and convenience for users with or without a screen guard, while being cost-effective and easy to manufacture.

Implementation Method 1

the first magnet pair provides an attractive magnetic force that biases the electronic device in the closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

the second magnet pair provides a repelling magnetic force that partially counteracts the biasing from the attractive magnetic force as a gap between the first portion and the second portion decreases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic repulsion: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS12352076B2Magnetic closure system for a device
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12352076B2 patent drawing
  • US12352076B2 patent drawing
  • US12352076B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved method and system for providing a magnetic closure system for an electronic device (100) may include a first portion (130), a second portion (150), a connecting element (145) pivotally connecting the first portion to the second portion and configured to enable the electronic device to fold between a closed position and an open position, and a magnetic element (160, 165) for providing a closure force to bias the electronic device in the closed position. The magnetic element may include a first magnet pair and a second magnet pair, each of the first magnet pair and second magnet pair including a first magnet housed within the first portion and a second magnet housed within the second portion. The first magnet pair may provide an attractive magnetic force that biases the electronic device in the closed position, while the second magnet pair may provide a repelling magnetic force that partially counteracts the biasing from the attractive magnetic force as a gap between the first portion and the second portion decreases, and a pole size of the second magnet pair is smaller than a pole size of the first magnet pair.