Foldable Pallet Cover With Articulated Frame

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pallet covers do not efficiently collapse to a small volume, lack stability, and hinder accessibility to stored goods, especially on construction sites where weather protection is needed.

Innovation Solution

A collapsible pallet cover with a U-shaped frame that allows side and rear walls to pivot, a hinged front wall, and a circumferential edge web for compact storage and easy assembly, enabling secure weather protection and easy access to goods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the pallet cover is made foldable with collapsible side walls, then the storage volume is reduced, but the stability of the cover is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage volumeVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into multiple separable components (longitudinal frame part, frame side parts, front longitudinal frame part) that can be articulated relative to each other. This segmentation allows the cover to be folded into a compact configuration for storage while maintaining structural integrity when assembled, resolving the contradiction between reduced storage volume and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover employs articulated connections between wall parts and frame components, enabling dynamic transformation between the unfolded protective configuration and the folded compact configuration. This dynamic capability allows the cover to adapt its shape for both stability during use and compactness for storage, addressing both requirements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the walls are made rigid for stability, then the ease of folding is reduced, but if the walls are made flexible for easy folding, then the protective capability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of foldingVSAvoidweather protection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is segmented into multiple wall parts (front wall, rear wall, side walls) that can be independently articulated and folded. This segmentation enables easy folding operation while each individual wall part maintains sufficient rigidity to provide effective weather protection when in the protective position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wall parts are designed with articulated connections that enable dynamic folding motion while maintaining structural rigidity in the deployed position. This dynamic design allows the walls to be easily folded for storage yet remain stiff enough to protect against wind, rain, and sun when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the cover is made completely enclosed for maximum protection, then the accessibility to goods is hindered, but if the cover is made open for easy access, then the protection capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to goodsVSAvoidweather protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cover employs dynamically adjustable wall parts that can be articulated to different positions. The front wall can be folded back and the side walls can be pivoted to provide open access to goods while the rear wall and other portions remain in place to maintain weather protection. This dynamic configurability resolves the contradiction between accessibility and protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Stability of the object's composition

If transverse braces are added to prevent folding, then the stability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding transverse braces, the frame is segmented into articulated components (longitudinal frame part, frame side parts) that inherently provide structural stability through their geometric arrangement and connection points. This segmentation approach achieves stability without requiring additional bracing elements, thereby avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP1982925A1Foldable palette covering
Publication Date: 2008.10.22 HACKL THOMAS
  • EP1982925A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1982925A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1982925A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The cover (1) has inwardly folding side walls (3) bounding at least partly opening longitudinal walls that form a cover above the palette (5), a front wall (4) and a rear wall. The cover is pivotably joined to a frame that consists at least of a long frame part to which the rear wall is joined so as to be inwardly foldable and further walls are joined to the cover or to the rear wall in a hinged manner.