Foldable Polygonal Frame Sport Training Structure for Compact Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sport training structures with step training loops are not fixed, leading to positional changes, inconvenience in rearrangement, and increased volume when not in use due to fixed sizes and inability to be folded, making storage and transportation difficult.

Innovation Solution

A sport training structure comprising brackets and pivot members that allow for the construction of foldable polygonal frames, connected by second pivot members made of elastic material, enabling multiple configurations and easy folding for storage, with additional pivot members for constructing hurdles or tables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If step training loops are made fixed in size and shape, then training effectiveness is improved, but storage and transportation volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidstorage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The training loop is divided into multiple rigid polygonal frames that can be segmented and connected through pivot members. Each frame maintains its rigid structure for training effectiveness, while the connection pivots enable folding for compact storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure incorporates dynamic pivot connections between rigid frames, allowing the system to transition between an expanded configuration for training and a folded configuration for storage. The pivot members enable controlled movement while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If step training loops are made non-foldable with determined sizes, then structural stability is improved, but ease of storage and transportation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidease of storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The training loop is segmented into multiple rigid polygonal frames connected by pivot members. Each frame maintains its rigid structure for stability, while the pivot connections enable folding for easy storage and transportation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure uses dynamic pivot connections between rigid frames, allowing transition between expanded (stable) and folded (compact) configurations. The pivot members enable controlled movement while maintaining structural integrity during both states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If step training loops are made without fixing mechanisms, then ease of assembly is improved, but positional stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidpositional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The structure employs pivot connections that provide dynamic stability - the frames can be easily assembled and disassembled through simple pivot movements, yet maintain positional stability when deployed. The elastic pivot members provide natural resistance to displacement while allowing controlled adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The elastic pivot members provide self-centering and self-stabilizing properties through their elastic deformation characteristics. When frames are assembled, the elastic pivots naturally settle into stable positions, providing positional stability without requiring additional fixing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If multiple training tools are constructed with fixed structures, then training functionality is improved, but adaptability for different configurations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining functionalityVSAvoidconfiguration adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The structure uses dynamic pivot connections between rigid frames, allowing transition between expanded (functional) and folded (compact) configurations. The pivot members enable controlled movement while maintaining structural integrity during both states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The same rigid frames and pivot members can be configured to form different polygonal shapes and sizes, providing multiple training configurations. The universal connection design allows the structure to adapt to various training needs while maintaining structural reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure provides versatile training tools with diverse assembly modes, reduces storage and transportation volume, and enhances user convenience by allowing easy rearrangement and compact storage.

Implementation Method 1

each of the first pivot members is made of elastic material and is formed integrally

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10603547B2Sport training structure
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 HSU CHI KUN
  • US10603547B2 patent drawing
  • US10603547B2 patent drawing
  • US10603547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sport training structure includes a plurality of brackets and a plurality of first pivot members connected with the brackets. Each of the first pivot members has two connecting portions. Two of the first pivot members are mounted between two of the brackets to construct a polygonal frame, with each of the two connecting portions of each of the first pivot members being pivotally connected with one of the two pivot ends of each of the brackets. In such a manner, the two of the brackets are pivoted about the two of the first pivot members, so that the polygonal frame is foldable.