Foldable Substrate with Segmented Glass and Organic Hinges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flexible display devices face challenges with substrates that are either not foldable, like thin glass substrates, or lack stability and mechanical strength, such as plastic substrates, leading to complex manufacturing processes and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A foldable substrate is designed with a combination of rigid supporting portions made of glass and a flexible foldable portion made of organic materials like polyethylene naphthalene, polyethylene terephthalate, or polyimide, which allows for both rigidity and foldability by connecting glass substrates with an organic material, preventing deformation during manufacturing and enabling bending and folding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a thin glass substrate is used, then rigidity is improved, but foldability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidfoldability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is divided into multiple rigid supporting portions separated by flexible foldable portions. This segmentation allows different regions to have different functions: rigid portions provide structural support while flexible portions enable folding, thus resolving the contradiction between rigidity and foldability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the substrate are assigned different material properties. The rigid supporting portions use glass or other rigid materials for strength, while the foldable portions use flexible materials for bendability. This local differentiation allows the overall substrate to possess both rigidity and foldability simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If a plastic substrate is used, then foldability is improved, but mechanical strength and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefoldabilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate structure is segmented into rigid supporting portions and flexible foldable portions. The rigid portions compensate for the weak mechanical strength of plastic, while the flexible portions maintain foldability. This segmentation allows the composite structure to overcome the limitations of pure plastic substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate combines rigid materials (glass, metal, or rigid plastic) with flexible materials (flexible plastic or polymer) to create a composite structure. This composite approach integrates the advantages of both material types: rigidity and strength from the rigid portions, and flexibility and foldability from the flexible portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If a plastic substrate is used, then ease of manufacturing is improved, but product stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufacturingVSAvoidproduct stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is segmented into rigid supporting portions and flexible foldable portions that can be manufactured separately and then assembled. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining ease of manufacturing through modular construction, and the final assembled structure achieves high stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a glass substrate is used as carrier, then product stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the functions of the carrier substrate and the display substrate into a single integrated foldable substrate structure. The rigid supporting portions provide the stability previously requiring a separate glass carrier, while the flexible foldable portions enable folding functionality. This merging eliminates the need for separate carrier substrates and complex separation processes, reducing device complexity while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10141527B2Foldable substrate, method for forming the same and flexible display device
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
  • US10141527B2 patent drawing
  • US10141527B2 patent drawing
  • US10141527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A foldable substrate, a method for forming the same, and a flexible display device are provided. The foldable substrate includes a plurality of rigid supporting portions separated from each other, every two of which are not in contact with each other, and a flexible foldable portion connecting two adjacent rigid supporting portions of the plurality of rigid supporting portions.