Foldable-Tab Tamper-Evident Packaging with Reversible Reclosure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing packaging technologies lack a tamper-evident system that ensures the integrity of contents while allowing flexible opening and closing operations without altering the anti-tampering mechanism, and are not suitable for mass production due to precision requirements or vulnerability to fraudulent manipulations.

Innovation Solution

A pre-cut sheet for packaging with hinged panels and foldable tabs that form anti-tamper devices, featuring reversible and irreversible closure mechanisms, using the elasticity of the material to ensure irreversible locking and visible tampering detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If adhesive sealing is used for mass production, then productivity is improved, but reliability of tamper-evident protection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass production capabilityVSAvoidtamper-evident protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging is divided into two distinct sealing systems: a first closure with irreversible anti-tamper sealing (tabs with fins that deform permanently) and a second closure with reversible sealing. This segmentation allows the first closure to provide reliable tamper evidence while the second enables flexible re-closing, resolving the contradiction between reliable protection and operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tab structure utilizes elastic deformation parameters - the fin deforms elastically during insertion into the slot and remains deformed to provide irreversible locking. This parameter change from elastic to permanently deformed state ensures tamper evidence while maintaining manufacturability through standard folding and slotting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If folding tabs with high precision are used, then reliability of tamper-evident protection is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper-evident protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tab structure is self-regulating through its elastic fin design. The fin automatically deforms to the correct degree during insertion into the slot, providing self-adjusting locking without requiring precision control during manufacturing. This eliminates the need for complex precision folding operations while ensuring reliable tamper evidence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If irreversible sealing is used, then reliability of tamper evidence is improved, but adaptability for subsequent opening and closing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper evidenceVSAvoidreopening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The packaging incorporates two separate closure systems: the first closure provides irreversible anti-tamper sealing, while the second closure enables reversible opening and closing operations. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by providing both tamper evidence reliability and operational adaptability through distinct functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static irreversible seal to a dynamic multi-state system where the first closure remains permanently sealed (irreversible) while the second closure can be dynamically opened and closed multiple times. This dynamic design accommodates both tamper evidence requirements and subsequent reopening needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides tamper-evident packaging that allows legitimate opening and closing while preventing unauthorized access, ensuring the integrity of contents and facilitating mass production with visible indicators of tampering attempts.

Implementation Method 1

said tab being configured to be inserted, after folding said first and second fold lines, into a corresponding slot to irreversibly seal said first closure of said packaging by elastic return of said fin along said second fold line and blocking in said slot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic return: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4617185A1Tamper-evident package and manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 ATRILUX
  • EP4617185A1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4617185A1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP4617185A1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

Pre-cut sheet for producing a packaging with an anti-tamper device by folding comprising: - a set of hinged panels configured to form faces of said packaging, - a set of closing flaps to form closures of said packaging, - at least one anti-tamper device configured to irreversibly seal a first closure of said packaging, said at least one anti-tamper device comprising at least one foldable tab, said tab being configured to be inserted into a corresponding slot to irreversibly seal said first closure of said packaging by elastic return and blocking in said slot, - at least one reversible closing device with opening indicator to reversibly seal a second closure of said packaging.