Foldable Tray Blank With Segmented Compartments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional foldable trays lack improved carrying and securing abilities, are not easily adaptable to articles of various sizes, and have complex folding processes, making them economically inefficient for the food and beverage industry.

Innovation Solution

A foldable blank for forming a tray with distinct panels and segments, including cutouts and adhesive strips, allowing for easy assembly into a unitary tray that can accommodate different-sized articles, featuring a handle and article retainers for secure storage and transport.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional foldable trays are designed as unitary size, then manufacturing is simple, but articles of various sizes cannot be accommodated and products move within the tray

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of various sized articlesVSAvoidtray structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tray is divided into multiple modular compartments separated by dividers. Each compartment can independently hold articles of different sizes, preventing movement while maintaining a simple unitary blank structure that folds into place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tray design incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable elements that allow the same tray structure to accommodate various sizes and types of articles (cups, plates, containers) through movable dividers and flexible compartment arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional trays lack securing mechanisms, then the structure is simple, but articles cannot be securely held during transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring ability of articlesVSAvoidtray structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Article retainers are strategically positioned at specific locations within compartments rather than throughout the entire tray. These localized securing elements provide targeted retention for articles during transport without adding unnecessary complexity to the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The tray structure utilizes its own folded walls and compartments to create natural retention spaces for articles, eliminating the need for separate complex securing mechanisms while maintaining article stability during transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the folding sequence is complex, then the tray can be assembled, but the assembly process is not quick and simple

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The blank is pre-configured with pre-creased fold lines and pre-positioned adhesive areas that guide the folding sequence. This preliminary structuring allows the tray to be assembled quickly through intuitive folding actions without requiring complex instructions or multiple steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple structural elements are combined into a single unitary blank that folds into the complete tray. This integration eliminates the need for separate assembly of multiple parts, reducing assembly time and simplifying the process to a single continuous folding action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11801984B2Blank for forming a container tray
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 WESTROCK SHARED SERVICES LLC
  • US11801984B2 patent drawing
  • US11801984B2 patent drawing
  • US11801984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A blank for forming a tray, wherein the blank includes a first panel extending along a lateral axis configured to form an outer side of an erected tray and a second panel extending along the lateral axis coupled to the first panel by a fold line, the second panel being configured to form an inner side of the erected tray. Each of the first and second panels includes a base section, a first lateral section foldably coupled to the base section, a first end section foldably coupled to the first lateral section, a second lateral section foldably coupled to the base section, and a second end section foldably coupled to the second lateral section.