Foldable Walker Arc Frame and Self-Adjusting Brake

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing foldable walkers face issues with robustness, manufacturing costs, bulky designs, entanglement risks, and complex braking mechanisms, which compromise safety and usability.

Innovation Solution

A foldable walker design featuring arc-shaped support members with elongate pivot rods, a laterally-foldable seat, a self-adjusting brake rod assembly with a gripping member, and a collapsible basket that remains attached during folding, using fewer parts and a streamlined brake housing to enhance safety and ease of use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If walkers have many parts to accommodate variety of body shapes and provide strong frame, then frame strength and adaptability are improved, but manufacturing costs increase and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The walker frame is designed with universal features that can accommodate various body shapes and user needs through a standardized yet adaptable structure. The frame members are configured to work together in multiple configurations, providing strength and support across different user requirements without requiring numerous specialized parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple frame members are merged into integrated assemblies where components serve multiple functions. The cross members, support members, and connecting mechanisms are combined to create a unified structure that provides both strength and adaptability while reducing the total number of separate parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If walkers have many parts to accommodate variety of body shapes, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to body shapesVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The walker employs universal frame members and connecting mechanisms that can be used across different configurations and user types. This standardized approach maintains adaptability to various body shapes while enabling efficient manufacturing through repeated use of the same components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame is segmented into modular sections that can be independently manufactured and then assembled. This segmentation allows for cost-effective production of standardized modules while maintaining the ability to configure the walker for different user needs through simple assembly variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If walkers use thick heavy duty metals to make square or rounded-square frames, then frame strength is improved, but walker weight increases and manageability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidwalker weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The frame members are designed with varying cross-sectional properties and material distributions tailored to specific structural requirements. Critical load-bearing areas have enhanced strength, while non-critical areas use lighter construction, optimizing the strength-to-weight ratio throughout the frame structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The walker frame utilizes composite construction combining different materials or material properties in strategic locations. This allows achieving required frame strength through material composition and structural design rather than uniformly using heavy duty metals throughout the entire frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of operation

If walkers require brake pad adjustment mechanisms to be exposed for user adjustment, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability decreases due to entanglement and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake adjustment accessibilityVSAvoidbrake mechanism durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary protective housing or cover is introduced between the user and the brake pad adjustment mechanism. This intermediary structure allows the adjustment mechanism to remain accessible for operation while protecting it from entanglement with clothing and reducing exposure to wear and tear from the external environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8936256B2Foldable walker apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.01.20 EVOLUTION TECH
  • US8936256B2 patent drawing
  • US8936256B2 patent drawing
  • US8936256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a walker apparatus. The walker apparatus has a pair of spaced-apart, arc-shaped support members. The walker apparatus includes a pair of elongate pivot rods operatively connected to respective ones the support members. The walker apparatus includes a laterally-foldable seat. The seat pivotally connects to the support members via the pivot rods. According to one aspect, each support member has an apex. The elongate pivot rods operatively connect to respective ones of the apexes of the support members.