Folded Cascode Instrumentation Amplifier With Multi-Loop CMRR Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing instrumentation amplifiers suffer from large input capacitance due to the Miller effect, leading to distortion and common mode component issues, particularly when the load connected to ground is not symmetrical, resulting in unequal current supply and distortion.

Innovation Solution

The proposed instrumentation amplifier employs a differential folded cascode amplifying stage with multiple feedback networks and a current buffer stage, utilizing resistor networks to provide feedback and cancellation currents, ensuring high common mode rejection and low distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional instrumentation amplifier topology is used, then the circuit structure is simple, but the input capacitance is large due to the Miller effect causing distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit structureVSAvoidsignal distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental circuit topology from traditional operational amplifier-based design to folded cascode architecture, fundamentally altering the electrical parameters including input capacitance, gain characteristics, and frequency response. This parameter transformation resolves the Miller effect issue while maintaining circuit functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional two-stage operational amplifier mechanism with a folded cascode single-stage architecture, substituting the conventional signal processing mechanism with an alternative that achieves the same function without the harmful Miller effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the load connected to ground is not symmetrical, then the circuit can handle practical loading conditions, but the output stages supply unequal currents generating distortion and common mode components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading condition adaptabilityVSAvoidsignal distortion and common mode rejection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent intentionally introduces asymmetry through the third feedback loop that references ground potential, creating an imbalance in the feedback networks that specifically counteracts the effects of asymmetrical loading. This controlled asymmetry compensates for external loading asymmetries, maintaining equal current supply to output stages despite unequal load conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a third feedback loop that senses the common mode voltage at the output and feeds it back to the input stage through a third resistor, creating a feedback mechanism that actively compensates for asymmetrical loading effects and maintains common mode rejection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If feedback networks have no reference to ground, then the circuit maintains simple feedback structure, but the networks do not sense common mode signal reducing common mode rejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback network structureVSAvoidcommon mode rejection ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a third feedback loop that acts as an intermediary between the output stage and input stage, specifically designed to sense and feedback common mode signals. This intermediary feedback path enables common mode rejection without significantly complicating the overall feedback structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the feedback function into three separate loops: two differential feedback loops for differential signal handling and one common mode feedback loop for common mode signal sensing. This segmentation allows each feedback network to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3439174B1Plural feedback loops instrumentation folded cascode amplifier
Publication Date: 2020.12.16 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • EP3439174B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3439174B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3439174B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An instrumentation amplifier (500) configured for providing high common mode rejection is described and includes an input differential stage (505, 506) configured to receive a differential input voltage and a folded cascode amplifying stage (514, 515) configured to receive output current mode signals provided from the input differential stage (505, 506). A plurality of feedback networks is provided to improve the input differential stage (505, 506). The amplifier may operate to provide an enhanced common mode rejection ratio of a single gain block in the instrumentation amplifier (500). In some examples, the circuitry may have a differential folded cascode amplifying stage which permits high precision and low distortion of amplified signals without degrading the common mode rejection ratio.