Folding Articulating Wing Mechanism With Curvilinear Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current deployable wing mechanisms face challenges in efficiently transitioning between fully retracted and fully deployed positions, requiring complex actuation systems and often compromising on structural integrity and aerodynamic efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A folding and locking wing mechanism featuring a base with an integrally formed cylindrical mounting hub and a wing made of impact-resistant materials, utilizing a multi-staged screw shaft and curvilinear surfaces for secure engagement and rotation, allowing for smooth deployment and locking without sharp transitions, and incorporating a torsion spring for assisted deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If complex actuation systems are used for deploying wings, then the wing can transition between retracted and deployed positions, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewing deployment capabilityVSAvoidactuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wing is divided into multiple segments that can be independently controlled. Each segment has its own actuation mechanism, allowing the wing to be deployed in stages rather than as a single complex movement, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining full deployment capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wing structure incorporates movable joints and articulation points that allow dynamic adjustment during deployment. The wing can transition from a retracted position to a deployed position through controlled rotation at multiple joints, enabling operation without requiring a complex fixed-geometry actuation system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If sharp transitions are used in wing deployment, then the deployment speed increases, but structural stress increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidstructural stress
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The wing structure incorporates curved surfaces and gradual transition zones instead of sharp angles or abrupt changes in geometry. The curvilinear design allows stress to be distributed more evenly during deployment, reducing peak stresses while maintaining high deployment speed through optimized curvature profiles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The wing structure includes built-in compliance elements and stress-distributing features positioned at critical locations before deployment occurs. These features are designed to absorb and distribute impact stresses that occur during rapid deployment, preventing stress concentration while maintaining deployment speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If gap-free symmetric airfoil shape is maintained during deployment, then aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but the mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoiddeployment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wing employs asymmetric control surface arrangements and differential actuation of wing segments to achieve symmetric aerodynamic profiles during deployment. By using asymmetric mechanisms in a controlled manner, the wing can transition through intermediate positions while maintaining symmetric airfoil shapes, improving aerodynamic efficiency without requiring overly complex symmetric mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The deployment mechanism dynamically adjusts the position and orientation of wing segments in real-time to maintain a gap-free symmetric airfoil shape during transition. Control systems monitor wing position and adjust actuation commands to ensure symmetric profiles are maintained throughout deployment, achieving high aerodynamic efficiency through dynamic control rather than static mechanism design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism enables reliable, high-speed deployment and locking of the wing with reduced structural stress and aerodynamic drag, maintaining a gap-free, symmetric airfoil shape, and can withstand rotational impacts, enhancing flight control and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

incorporating a torsion spring for assisted deployment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentUS8894004B1Folding articulating wing mechanism
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US8894004B1 patent drawing
  • US8894004B1 patent drawing
  • US8894004B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Obliquely folding articulating wing mechanisms that include a wing rotatingly connected to a base.