Adjustable child restraint device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional child restraint devices outside the home often fail to accommodate children of varying sizes, leading to unrestricted movement that inhibits adult freedom in public settings.

Innovation Solution

A portable folding child restraint device with a specially configured frame and corrugated seat that can be adjusted to fit different child sizes, featuring a foldable design allowing the seat to be compactly stored and securely attached to benches or chairs, using pivotal connections and locking mechanisms to ensure stability and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional child restraint devices are used outside the home, then portability is improved, but child movement restriction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidchild movement restriction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The seat back and seat bottom are designed as adjustable components that can be configured in different positions and angles. The seat back can be adjusted to various recline angles and the seat bottom can be positioned at different heights and orientations, allowing the restraint device to adapt to different child sizes and movement patterns while maintaining portability through its folding frame structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device allows changing of geometric parameters including the angle of the seat back, the height and position of the seat bottom, and the overall configuration of the frame. These parameter adjustments enable the same portable device to effectively restrain children of varying sizes without compromising the portability advantage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If adjustable features are added to accommodate different child sizes, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of varying child sizesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The seat structure is divided into separate adjustable components: the seat back is a distinct element that can be independently positioned, and the seat bottom is another separate component that can be adjusted independently. This segmentation allows each component to be simplified in design while collectively providing the needed adjustability for different child sizes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The folding frame structure serves multiple functions: it provides the structural support for the seat, enables the portability through folding capability, and accommodates the adjustable seat back and seat bottom components. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate mechanisms, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10575658B2Adjustable child restraint device
Publication Date: 2020.03.03 EAST BABIES LLC
  • US10575658B2 patent drawing
  • US10575658B2 patent drawing
  • US10575658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A child restraining device in the form of a folding or foldable chair includes a frame with a back. The back of the frame has parallel rods and a bottom foldably attached to the back by lockable hinges. The apparatus has upper and lower corrugated panels attached to the frame. There are a plurality of straps which fit removably through slots on the seat back and seat bottom. These straps are part of a harness that can be adjusted to the height/size of the child to be restrained.