Folding Container Closure with Interference Fit Seal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Soft-sided insulated containers often lack an effective seal when closed, leading to potential spills during transport or when the container is tipped over, and they also fail to provide a secure closure mechanism for added protection.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a first closure member with a stiffened peripheral frame and a second closure member that engages the first in a secure interference fit, providing a tighter seal and additional securement through a secondary closure mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a zipper closure is used in soft-sided insulated containers, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability of sealing is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of closure operationVSAvoidsealing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system is divided into multiple independent components: a zipper for easy operation and a separate snap closure mechanism for secure sealing. The snap closure engages with the zipper to provide additional sealing, allowing each component to optimize its function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closure mechanism transitions from a single-mode operation to a multi-mode system where the snap closure can engage at different positions along the zipper track. This allows the sealing pressure and engagement force to be adjusted independently from the ease of opening operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If stiffer materials are used to create an interference fit seal, then reliability of sealing is improved, but ease of operation is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidease of closure operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is separated from the opening/closing function. The snap closure provides the interference fit sealing action, while the zipper handles the easy opening operation. This segmentation allows the stiffer sealing mechanism to exist without making the overall closure difficult to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The snap closure acts as an intermediary between the zipper and the container body. It translates the simple zipper motion into a secure sealed state through its interference fit engagement, mediating between ease of operation and sealing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a secondary closure mechanism is added to secure the lid, then reliability is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure securityVSAvoidclosure mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The snap closure mechanism is merged with the zipper structure, using the same track and engagement points. This integration allows the secondary closure to provide enhanced security without adding separate, independent components that would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The snap closure serves multiple functions: it provides additional sealing, secures the lid in place, and works in conjunction with the zipper. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the container's ability to maintain contents securely, both when closed and during transport, by providing a more effective seal and additional securement, thus preventing spills and ensuring contents remain intact.

Implementation Method 1

The first closure member defines a rigid land. The second closure member defines a stiffened member. In the closed position of the second closure member relative to the first closure member the stiffened member is operable to engage the rigid land

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference fit: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20250162783A1Folding container with cover
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 CALIFORNIA INNOVATIONS
  • US20250162783A1 patent drawing
  • US20250162783A1 patent drawing
  • US20250162783A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A soft sided insulated container assembly includes a first portion having an insulated, soft sided external wall structure, and a substantially rigid molded plastic frame that defines the opening of a receptacle of the soft-sided insulated main body of the container. The frame is removable from the main body. It has a rigid cover structure that includes a reinforcement member for engaging a land region of the molded frame, thereby tending to yield an interface tending to have a sealing relationship. The container is foldable, and has stiffening panels in the front and rear walls to facilitate folding.