Folding Device with Error-Free Actuation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing folding devices for protruding decorative layers on workpieces are mechanically complex, expensive, and prone to wear, with a high risk of malfunctions and the need for extensive adjustments with small product changes, and require comprehensive visual inspections to ensure accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A device and method using actuating cylinders with a control device to ensure error-free actuation, incorporating a marking device for verifying correct folding and potentially using sensors to detect correct actuation and a heating device for welding the decorative layer to the workpiece, reducing the need for visual inspections and allowing for flexible adaptation to product changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wedge slide mechanisms are used to actuate the folding stamp, then the folding device is mechanically reliable, but the device complexity increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding device reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical wedge slide mechanism with a control device that coordinates the actuation of multiple actuating cylinders. This substitution eliminates complex mechanical linkages while maintaining reliable folding operation through electronic control and sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses actuating cylinders (pneumatic or hydraulic) to replace the mechanical wedge slide mechanism for actuating the folding stamp. This provides a more reliable and less complex actuation system that is easier to control and adjust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Reliability

If wedge slide mechanisms are used to actuate the folding stamp, then the folding device is reliable, but the extent of automation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding device reliabilityVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The control device replaces the manual adjustment and operation of wedge slide mechanisms with automated electronic control. The control device receives signals from sensors and automatically coordinates the actuating cylinders, significantly increasing the automation level while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates sensors that detect the position and status of folding stamps and workpieces, providing feedback to the control device. This closed-loop feedback system enables automated adjustment and operation, replacing manual mechanical systems with intelligent automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of actuating cylinders are used to actuate folding stamps, then the adaptability to product changes increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to product changesVSAvoidcomponent quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device serves multiple functions: it coordinates all actuating cylinders, processes sensor signals, determines actuation correctness, and controls the marking device. This universal control system manages the complexity of multiple cylinders through integrated electronic control rather than separate mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors provide real-time feedback on the position and status of each folding stamp and workpiece, enabling the control device to automatically coordinate multiple actuating cylinders. This feedback mechanism reduces the perceived complexity by providing intelligent coordination of multiple components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive visual checks are performed after folding, then the manufacturing precision is ensured, but the productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefolding accuracyVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors automatically detect the position and status of folding stamps and workpieces during the folding process, providing real-time feedback to the control device. This automated detection replaces manual visual inspection, ensuring manufacturing precision without reducing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The folding device performs self-inspection through sensors that automatically detect folding correctness and workpiece status. The system determines actuation correctness autonomously without requiring external visual inspection, maintaining both precision and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Ease of operation

If the control device determines error-free actuation and applies a marking, then the ease of operation increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection simplicityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The marking device applies visual marks (such as colored markings or labels) to workpieces to indicate correct folding. This provides an immediate, easily observable signal of proper operation, greatly simplifying the ease of operation despite the added control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control device uses sensor feedback to automatically determine actuation correctness and triggers the marking device accordingly. This automated decision-making and marking process simplifies operation by providing clear visual confirmation without requiring complex manual inspection procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3037244B1Device and method for folding a decorative layer around a workpiece
Publication Date: 2017.03.29 DR STOFFEL KAI KONSTANTIN
  • EP3037244B1 patent drawing
  • EP3037244B1 patent drawing
  • EP3037244B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a device and a method for folding over an edge of a protruding decorative layer on a workpiece, in which said workpiece is arranged, along with the protruding decorative layer, on a retainer, the advancement of a plurality of edge-folding stamps allowing the protruding decorative layer to be bent and placed against the workpiece, said edge-folding stamps being actuated by actuating cylinders controlled by a control device, and said edge-folding stamps being moved between a retracted position and an edge-folding position. In addition, error free actuation of the actuating cylinders is determined by the control device and a mark is applied onto the workpiece, by means of a marking device, when said control device determines an error-free actuation of the actuating cylinders during the edge-folding method.