Folding Device Selection via User Priority Preferences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sheet processing apparatuses lack an efficient method to select the optimal folding device based on user preferences for folding processes, leading to potential mismatches in processing speed and output quality.

Innovation Solution

A sheet processing apparatus with multiple folding devices and a control unit that accepts user settings and priority preferences, allowing the control unit to select the most suitable folding device for the job based on the specified preferences, ensuring either faster processing or a tidier finish.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple folding devices are provided without a selection mechanism, then the system has high processing capacity, but the system cannot efficiently select the optimal device based on user preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoiddevice selection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit changes the operational parameters by selecting different folding devices based on user-specified preferences (such as folding speed, folding method, or output quality). This allows the system to optimize device selection dynamically according to job requirements without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting the appropriate folding device based on pre-stored preference information and current job settings. The control unit independently makes the selection decision without user intervention, improving operational efficiency while maintaining user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Speed

If the system automatically selects folding devices without user preferences, then processing speed is high, but output quality may not meet user requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidoutput quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by storing user preferences regarding folding quality, speed, and method. The control unit references this feedback information when selecting folding devices, ensuring that automatic selection aligns with user expectations for both speed and quality outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-storing user preferences and device capability information before actual folding operations. This allows the control unit to make informed selections that balance speed and quality requirements without real-time user input during processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If different folding devices are used for different preferences, then user convenience is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions by managing device selection, storing preferences, and coordinating folding operations. This universal control approach allows the system to handle diverse user preferences and device types through a single intelligent controller, reducing overall system complexity despite multiple folding devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11970360B2Sheet processing apparatus and control method therefor
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11970360B2 patent drawing
  • US11970360B2 patent drawing
  • US11970360B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sheet processing apparatus includes a plurality of folding devices, a control unit that controls a job involving a folding process, and an input unit that accepts settings for the job from a user. The input unit accepts, from the user, specification of a priority preference out of a plurality of predetermined preferences related to the folding process. The control unit selects, out of the plurality of folding devices, a folding device that can perform the folding process with the settings for the job made by the user as a target folding device. If a plurality of target folding devices are present, then based on the priority preference, the control unit determines, out of the plurality of target folding devices, a folding device with which to perform the folding process.