Height-Adjustable Folding Table Case for Compact Aircraft Seating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Folding tables in commercial aircraft, particularly in first or business class, cannot be installed in the backrest of the front seat due to limited seat pitch, requiring attachment to the side wall or credenza, and existing solutions lack versatility and ease of handling.

Innovation Solution

A folding table arrangement featuring a height-adjustable table case on a support device with horizontal displacement capabilities, using slide rails and external power assistance for easy deployment and stowage, allowing the table top to pivot from a vertical stowed position to a horizontal use position, with separate table box supports for enhanced adjustability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the table case is made height-adjustable on the support device, then the table top can be positioned above credenza height for better usability, but the device complexity increases due to additional adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusability of table top positioningVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustment mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The table case is made height-adjustable through a dynamic mechanism that allows it to be positioned at different heights relative to the support device. This enables the table top to be placed above the credenza height for better ergonomics while maintaining the ability to return to a compact stowed position, thus improving usability without permanently increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment mechanism is segmented into discrete positioning levels or stages, allowing the table case to be adjusted to specific heights (including above credenza level) through a controlled mechanism. This segmentation makes the adjustment process manageable and intuitive while controlling the overall complexity of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If the table top is made fully self-supporting in use position, then the structure is simplified, but the table case must be sufficiently robust increasing its weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidweight of table case
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The table top is designed to be fully self-supporting in its use position, bearing its own weight and any loads placed upon it without requiring additional active support mechanisms. This simplifies the overall structure by eliminating the need for motors, sensors, or control systems to maintain the table top position, while the table case is dimensioned to provide sufficient structural strength to support this self-bearing configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If separate table box supports with horizontal displacement are added, then the adjustability and versatility of the arrangement is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of table case positionVSAvoidcomplexity of support mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Separate table box supports equipped with horizontal displacement capability are introduced, allowing the table case to be positioned not only at different heights but also at different horizontal locations along the support device. This adds a spatial dimension to the adjustability, enabling versatile positioning options while distributing the complexity across modular support components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Volume of moving object

If the table case accommodates the table top in a compact vertical stowed position, then the stowage efficiency is improved, but the mechanism for deploying and pivoting the table top becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestowage volume of table topVSAvoidcomplexity of deployment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The table top is designed to nest within the table case in a compact vertical stowed position, with the table top fitting inside or against the interior surfaces of the table case. This nesting arrangement maximizes stowage efficiency by minimizing the volume occupied during storage, while the deployment mechanism is designed to smoothly extract and pivot the nested table top into its horizontal use position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentEP1902949B1Folding table arrangement
Publication Date: 2009.11.11 LUFTHANSA TECHNIK AG
  • EP1902949B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1902949B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1902949B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The arrangement has a table box (5) for receiving a table top (7) in a vertical holdup position. The table box is arranged in a height adjustable manner at a support device i.e. vertical wall (1). The table top is adjustable from the vertical holdup position in the table box into a horizontal utilizable position. The table top supports itself with its lower side on the table box in the utilizable position. The table box is height adjustable relative to the support device in such a manner that it projects above an upper edge of the support device.