Follower Plate Seal Structure for Container Tolerance Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seals for follower plates in conveyor devices are difficult to assemble, provide inadequate sealing for highly viscous materials, and fail to compensate for container tolerances, leading to leakage issues.

Innovation Solution

A seal design featuring a first leg acting as a lever to press a second leg against the container wall, with adjustable angular and thickness ratios to enhance sealing efficacy, and an annular clamping band to secure the seal to the follower plate, ensuring effective sealing across varying container diameters and tolerances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a rigid seal with multiple lips is used to prevent material leakage, then sealing effect is improved, but the seal becomes difficult to assemble and cannot compensate for container tolerances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The seal is divided into multiple independent lips (first lip, second lip, third lip) that can function separately. Each lip can be optimized for specific functions: the first lip for initial sealing, the second lip for preventing material accumulation, and the third lip for final sealing. This segmentation allows the seal to maintain reliability while improving assembly ease compared to a single complex rigid seal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The seal design incorporates specific geometric parameters including lip angles (α between 60°-90°, preferably 75°-85°), lip lengths (20-60 mm), and thickness ratios (first leg to second leg between 1.1-2.0) that allow the seal to adapt to container tolerances while maintaining sealing effectiveness. These parameter optimizations enable the seal to function reliably without requiring complex assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If tight tolerances are maintained for container dimensions to ensure sealing, then sealing effect is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectVSAvoidcontainer tolerance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The seal is designed with specific geometric parameters including lip angles (α between 60°-90°), lip lengths (20-60 mm), and thickness ratios that provide built-in compensation for container dimensional variations. The first leg thickness to second leg thickness ratio of 1.1-2.0 creates a lever effect that maintains sealing pressure across varying container diameters, eliminating the need for tight container tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The seal incorporates dynamic elements that allow it to adapt to varying container dimensions. The lips are designed to flex and adjust their positioning based on the actual container geometry, maintaining effective sealing contact even when container diameters vary or the container is not perfectly round. This dynamic adaptation eliminates the need for precise manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the seal is pressed tightly against the container wall to prevent leakage, then sealing effect is improved, but force required to move the follower plate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectVSAvoidforce to move follower plate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Different parts of the seal have different properties optimized for their specific functions. The first lip, second lip, and third lip have different geometries and stiffness characteristics. The first leg is thicker than the second leg to provide structural support, while the sealing lips are designed with specific angles and lengths to create effective sealing with minimal friction. This local differentiation allows effective sealing without requiring excessive force across the entire seal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The seal geometry parameters including lip angles (60°-90°), lip lengths (20-60 mm), and thickness ratios are optimized to achieve effective sealing with minimal contact pressure. The first leg thickness to second leg thickness ratio of 1.1-2.0 creates a lever effect that amplifies sealing force at the contact point while requiring less overall force to move the follower plate. These parameter optimizations balance sealing effectiveness with mobility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The seal provides a robust and efficient sealing solution that maintains sealing efficacy even with large container tolerances and varying diameters, preventing material leakage and ensuring reliable conveyance of viscous materials.

Implementation Method 1

The first leg (2.1) acts on the second leg (2.3) as a lever

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Implementation Method 2

The seal (2), and in particular the leg (2.3), exhibits a certain elasticity for this purpose. This allows the seal (2), to conform to the container wall (1.1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4296546A1Seal for sealing a follow-up plate against a container and follow-up plate and conveyor with the seal
Publication Date: 2023.12.27 WAGNER INT
  • EP4296546A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4296546A1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP4296546A1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

The seal according to the invention for sealing a follower plate against a container has a first leg (2.1) with a first sealing lip (2.2) and a second leg (2.3) with a second sealing lip (2.4). The two legs (2.1, 2.3) are designed such that the first leg (2.1) acts as a lever and, when it presses against the container wall (1.1), presses the second leg (2.3) against the container wall (1.1).