Food-Contact Plastic Surface Treatment for Better Cleanability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for increasing the cleanability of plastic surfaces in contact with foodstuffs face issues such as incompatibility, high costs, environmental impact, and insufficient cleanability without coatings, particularly for plastic materials.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the treatment of plastic surfaces with a gas mixture containing 3-5% fluorine and 10-16% oxygen, at specific pressures and times, to enhance cleanability without the need for coatings, ensuring compatibility with foodstuffs and reducing detergent use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If fluorinated polymer coatings (PTFE, FEP, PFA) are applied to prevent food adhesion, then cleanability and anti-stick properties are improved, but food safety compatibility deteriorates due to potential contamination risks

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecleanabilityVSAvoidfood safety compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the harmful fluorinated polymer coating layer while retaining the desired anti-adhesion and cleanability properties through alternative means (surface treatment or different material composition), directly resolving the contradiction between cleanability improvement and food safety compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs food-safe alternative materials or treatments that can be used without the long-term safety concerns associated with fluorinated coatings, effectively replacing the problematic coating with safer, potentially shorter-lived or naturally degradable alternatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If ceramic coatings are applied to ensure food compatibility, then food safety compatibility is improved, but manufacturing cost deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood safety compatibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs cost-effective food-safe materials or treatments that achieve the same food compatibility function as expensive ceramic coatings, replacing high-cost solutions with more economically viable alternatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters or surface treatment parameters to achieve food safety compatibility through less expensive means, such as using naturally food-safe plastics or simpler surface treatments instead of costly ceramic applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If fluorine-containing treatment gas is used to improve cleanability of plastic surfaces, then cleanability is improved, but environmental impact deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecleanabilityVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the gas composition parameters by reducing or eliminating fluorine content while maintaining cleanability effectiveness through alternative active ingredients, thereby reducing environmental impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts potentially harmful fluorinated treatments into environmentally benign processes by using alternative gases or treatments that achieve the same cleanability improvement without the negative environmental consequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process significantly improves cleanability, allowing for effective cleaning with hot water alone, reduces detergent usage, and maintains compatibility with foodstuffs, while being economically viable and environmentally friendly.

Implementation Method 1

treating (E) at least the surface of the article 1 in a reaction chamber with a treatment gas, having a composition comprising from 3% to 5% in volume of fluorine, from 10% to 16% in volume of oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical treatment with fluorine-containing gas: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

a treatment gas, having a composition comprising from 3% to 5% in volume of fluorine, from 10% to 16% in volume of oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP2481769B1Article suitable for contact with foodstuffs and process for realizing the same
Publication Date: 2015.03.04 TESCOMA
  • EP2481769B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

An article suitable for contact with foodstuffs, comprising at least a contact surface made of plastic material, which contact surface is suitable and destined for use and for direct contact with foodstuffs, characterised in that at least the contact surface is pretreated with a treatment gas having a composition comprising from 3% to 5% in volume of fluorine, from 10% to 16% in volume of oxygen, and at least a further inert gaseous component, at an absolute pressure of the treatment gas comprised between 333mbar and 400mbar and for a treatment time comprised between about 10 and about 180 seconds, the contact surface exhibiting, following the treatment with the treatment gas, an improved cleanability with respect to the same contact surface before the treatment.