Food Portioning and Stacking With In-Line Weight Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food processing systems struggle to produce uniform large food portions with precise weight control, especially when dealing with varying product composition, requiring manual adjustments and separate weight checks due to fluctuations in slice weight and portion weight.

Innovation Solution

A system with a transport device and scale positioned downstream of the portioning section to measure the weight of partial portions and food portions, allowing for dynamic adjustments to ensure consistent weight, including a distribution unit to separate and space portions for accurate weighing and a control device to adjust cutting parameters based on weight measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high cutting speed is used to achieve high product throughput, then productivity is improved, but weight uniformity of portions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct throughputVSAvoidweight uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates scales that measure the weight of each portion in real-time and feeds this information back to the control device. The control device then dynamically adjusts cutting parameters (blade speed, feed rate, slice thickness) to compensate for weight deviations, ensuring uniform portion weights even at high cutting speeds of up to 2,000 slices per minute.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts cutting parameters based on real-time weight measurements. The control device modifies blade rotation speed, product feed rate, and slice thickness on-the-fly to maintain consistent portion weights, transitioning from static pre-set parameters to dynamic adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple partial portions are stacked to form large food portions, then portion size flexibility is improved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportion size flexibilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the portion formation process into two independent stages: (1) a standardized portioning section that creates uniform partial portions, and (2) a stacking device that assembles these partial portions into larger food portions. This segmentation allows the portioning section to operate at high speed with simple mechanics, while the stacking device handles the complexity of assembling multiple portions according to desired final sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The portioning section performs preliminary portioning by creating standardized partial portions with consistent weights and dimensions before they are stacked. This preliminary action simplifies the subsequent stacking process, as the control device only needs to assemble pre-formed uniform units rather than controlling the entire portion formation process from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If portions are produced in close succession to maintain high throughput, then productivity is improved, but weight measurement accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportion throughputVSAvoidweight measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces intermediate buffer zones and timing mechanisms between consecutive portion measurements. The control device coordinates the measurement, cutting, and stacking operations with precise timing, ensuring that each portion is fully formed and stationary on the scale before the next portion begins its formation, thereby eliminating measurement interference despite high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments are made to achieve target weight, then weight precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight precisionVSAvoidportion throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automated control where the control device automatically adjusts cutting parameters based on real-time weight measurements from the scales. This eliminates the need for manual intervention, as the system autonomously compensates for weight deviations by modifying blade speed, feed rate, or slice thickness, thereby maintaining high productivity while achieving precise target weights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4714872A2Food product processing system
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 WEBER FOOD TECHNOLOGY SE & CO KG
  • EP4714872A2 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4714872A2 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4714872A2 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

A food processing system comprises a slicing device configured to cut slices of food products and form portions of one or more slices in a portioning section. A conveying device is provided downstream of the portioning section, and the portioning section includes a conveyor that transfers the portions to the conveying device. The system includes a stacking device configured to form a food portion consisting of several portions. The conveying device is configured to transport the portions onto a product platform of the stacking device, and the conveying device and/or the stacking device includes a scale for measuring the weight of the portions and/or the food portion.