Method for operating a food processing apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food processing apparatuses lack an efficient method to collect and classify user and operational feedback for improving software and functionality, leading to suboptimal performance and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves collecting feedback information from food processing apparatuses through human-machine interfaces and sensors, classifying it centrally, and generating change signals to update user input requests and function programs, ensuring high-quality feedback is used for improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback information is collected from multiple apparatuses and classified centrally, then the quality of software improvement increases, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A central server acts as an intermediary between multiple food processing apparatuses and the software development process. The server collects feedback data from various apparatuses, performs centralized classification and evaluation of feedback quality, and generates improved software updates. This intermediary structure enables systematic feedback processing without requiring complex peer-to-peer communication between apparatuses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where user feedback and operational data from food processing apparatuses are collected, analyzed, and used to generate software improvements that are then deployed back to the apparatuses. This continuous feedback cycle ensures software quality improvement while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If feedback data is collected and processed centrally, then the precision of feedback classification improves, but the time required for data transmission and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback classification precisionVSAvoiddata transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and pre-processing feedback data in the background during apparatus operation. The central server continuously accumulates feedback information from multiple apparatuses and prepares classification results in advance, so that when software improvements are needed, the analysis is already complete or near-complete, minimizing additional transmission and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If high-quality feedback is selectively used for improvement, then the effectiveness of software updates increases, but the complexity of feedback evaluation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware improvement effectivenessVSAvoidfeedback evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates feedback quality by analyzing multiple parameters including data completeness, consistency with other feedback, relevance to actual usage scenarios, and temporal patterns. By systematically evaluating these parameters and setting thresholds for what constitutes 'high-quality' feedback, the system can automatically filter and select the most valuable feedback for software improvements without requiring complex manual evaluation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230190035A1Method for operating a food processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.06.22 WELBILT DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
  • US20230190035A1 patent drawing
  • US20230190035A1 patent drawing
  • US20230190035A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a food processing apparatus comprises: collecting feedback information by means of a human-machine interface (MMI), and/or by means of at least one sensor; creating, by means of a local control unit, feedback data sets representing one or more of the feedback information items; sending the feedback data sets from the apparatus to a central computing unit; classifying, by means of the central computing unit, the feedback data sets on the basis of at least one stored feedback comparison data set; generating, by means of the central computing unit, a change signal depending on the classification of at least one feedback data set; sending the change signal to the apparatus; changing a user input request directed to the user by the MMI in the apparatus based on the change signal and/or changing a function program of the apparatus based on the change signal.