Food Processing Wash Validation Using Real-Time Sensor Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current food processing systems face challenges in validating and verifying wash processes, especially for products without a kill step, such as ready-to-eat leafy greens, poultry, and fish, due to inadequate control over microbial risk and cross-contamination, particularly in dynamic and uncontrolled conditions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method that involves operating the food processing system for a validation period, measuring process metrics at multiple times, and using sensors to determine the validity of the process based on generated measurements, with a system comprising processors and sensors to control and adjust process parameters, ensuring the maintenance of critical levels for parameters like chlorine concentration and pH.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional pass-or-fail validation methods are used for wash processes, then the validation procedure is simple to implement, but the method is inadequate for dynamic processes where conditions vary and steady state is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of validation implementationVSAvoidadequacy of validation for dynamic processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The validation method transitions from static pass-or-fail criteria to dynamic continuous monitoring of process parameters. Sensors track chlorine concentration, pH, temperature, and other critical parameters throughout the wash process, allowing validation that adapts to varying process conditions rather than requiring steady state assumptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback through continuous measurement and monitoring of process parameters. The collected data is analyzed to determine process validity, providing ongoing feedback that allows adjustment and verification of wash process effectiveness under dynamic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are deployed for real-time monitoring of process parameters, then the precision of process control is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of process parameter monitoringVSAvoidcomplexity of sensor and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple sensors that can monitor various process parameters (chlorine concentration, pH, temperature, turbidity) simultaneously. This multi-functional approach allows comprehensive process validation through a unified system rather than separate monitoring systems for each parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically collects, analyzes, and interprets sensor data without requiring manual intervention. The validation process is self-executing, with the system determining process validity based on pre-established criteria and providing automated verification of wash process effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring and validation systems are implemented, then food safety and process control are improved, but the cost and complexity of the food processing system increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood safety and process controlVSAvoidcomplexity of validation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time feedback from continuous monitoring enables immediate detection of process deviations. The system automatically identifies when process parameters fall outside acceptable ranges, allowing for prompt corrective action to maintain food safety without requiring overly complex manual monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual validation procedures are replaced with automated sensor-based monitoring and data analysis systems. This substitution reduces the need for complex human-operated validation processes while improving consistency and reliability of food safety verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances food safety by providing real-time monitoring and control, preventing deviations and ensuring that the wash process meets desired standards, thereby reducing microbial risk and cross-contamination effectively.

Implementation Method 1

Sensors, such as electrodes, are used to monitor various attributes of process and wash water and other solutions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical sensing:

Implementation Method 2

the property of turbidity may be measured optically through a window by a sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS20230354870A1Methods and systems for validating wash processes and preventing process deviations in food processing
Publication Date: 2023.11.09 SMARTWASH SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US20230354870A1 patent drawing
  • US20230354870A1 patent drawing
  • US20230354870A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for validating wash processes and related operations for food processing, including preventing undesirable deviations in such food processing. One example method for validating a process for a food processing system generally includes: operating the food processing system on a food product according to the process, wherein the operating is performed for at least a validation period; measuring a process metric at multiple times during the validation period while the food processing system is operating according to the process, wherein the measuring generates a set of process metric measurements; and determining whether the process for the food processing system is valid, based on the set of process metric measurements.