Food Processor Adaptive Control Based on User Behavior Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric motor-driven food processors lack personalized support for users, failing to adapt to individual preferences and environmental conditions, which can affect the quality and efficiency of food preparation.

Innovation Solution

The food processor automatically controls its operating parameters based on user behavior patterns and environmental conditions, creating a personalized user profile to adjust settings such as ingredient substitutions, cooking times, and safety modes, using data storage and evaluation devices to recognize recurring preferences and adapt recipes accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the food processor uses fixed recipe parameters without personalization, then the device complexity is low, but the adaptability to user preferences is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user preferencesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The food processor automatically evaluates user behavior data and adjusts recipe parameters without requiring explicit user input for each adjustment. The system serves itself by learning from usage patterns and autonomously personalizing the cooking experience, thereby improving adaptability while minimizing the complexity burden on the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and stores user behavior data during initial usage, building a profile that enables future personalization. By performing this data accumulation and evaluation in advance, the system prepares the foundation for adaptive recipe adjustment without adding complexity during actual cooking operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the food processor collects and evaluates extensive user behavior data, then the personalization accuracy improves, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant behavioral parameters from extensive user data, such as ingredient substitution patterns and quantity adjustments. By focusing on key indicators rather than processing all possible data points, the system achieves high personalization accuracy while keeping data processing complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously evaluates user behavior feedback and refines its personalization model iteratively. This feedback mechanism allows the food processor to improve personalization accuracy over time by learning from user responses to suggested adjustments, without requiring complex upfront processing of all possible scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the food processor automatically adjusts operating parameters based on user behavior, then the ease of operation improves, but the loss of user control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial automation by suggesting recipe parameter adjustments based on user behavior rather than fully automating the process. This approach improves ease of operation by reducing manual adjustment effort while preserving user control, as users can review and modify suggested changes before final execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The food processor dynamically adapts its level of automation based on user preferences and behavior patterns. The system can adjust between more manual and more automatic modes, allowing users to maintain control when desired while benefiting from automation when convenient, thereby balancing ease of operation with user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3069643B1Method for operating an electric motorised kitchen appliance
Publication Date: 2021.04.28 VORWERK & CO INTERHOLDING GMBH
  • EP3069643B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3069643B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3069643B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an electric motor-driven food processor (1) for preparing food (2) based on a recipe, the food (2) being prepared in a vessel (3) of the food processor (1) through one or more successive preparation steps, in particular stirring and/or heating and/or chopping. In order to further support the user of the food processor (1) during preparation, it is proposed that an operating parameter of the food processor (1) should be set automatically depending on repeated, similar user behavior when selecting or processing a recipe and/or on the presence of a user in the Area of ​​the food processor (1) is controlled.