Food Processor Magnetic Interlock to Prevent Contamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical interlock systems in food processors are susceptible to contamination by liquids and food substrates, leading to reliability issues and difficulty in cleaning.

Innovation Solution

A non-contact interlock system using magnetic members and a sealed cavity to detect the proper positioning of the cover assembly, preventing motor operation only when the cover is securely closed, thus avoiding direct contact with food and liquids.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a mechanical interlock system is used to detect cover positioning, then the interlock functionality is achieved, but the system is susceptible to contamination by liquids and food substrates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlock functionalityVSAvoidcontamination by liquids and food substrates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical contact-based interlock system with a magnetic field-based detection system. Magnetic members are positioned on the cover assembly and base, allowing the interlock status to be detected through magnetic interaction without mechanical contact between moving parts. This eliminates the problem of food and liquid contamination while maintaining reliable interlock functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetic fields as an intermediary between the cover assembly and base to transmit interlock status information. Instead of direct mechanical contact, the magnetic field acts as a mediator that can detect cover positioning through non-contact means, preventing contamination while ensuring reliable detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a mechanical interlock system with moving parts is used, then the interlock functionality is achieved, but cleaning becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlock functionalityVSAvoidcleaning ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical moving parts with magnetic field-based detection components that have no moving parts requiring maintenance or cleaning. The magnetic members are positioned such that they do not create crevices or gaps where food particles could accumulate, making the appliance easier to clean while maintaining interlock functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the moving parts from the interlock detection mechanism, leaving only stationary magnetic members that can be easily cleaned. By removing the mechanical components that create cleaning difficulties, the system maintains its interlock functionality while significantly improving ease of cleaning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a non-contact magnetic interlock system is used, then contamination is prevented, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces a complex mechanical interlock system with a simpler magnetic field-based system. The magnetic members can be integrated into existing appliance components without requiring additional complex mechanisms, thereby reducing overall system complexity while preventing contamination through non-contact operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic members serve multiple functions: they provide the interlock detection capability, prevent contamination through non-contact operation, and can be integrated into existing appliance structures. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby managing system complexity while achieving contamination prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures reliable operation and easy cleaning by maintaining a sealed environment, preventing contamination and ensuring consistent functionality.

Implementation Method 1

The plunger member moves to the actuated position as the latch mechanism moves to the latched position due to a repulsion force between the first magnetic member of the latch mechanism and the upper magnetic member of the plunger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic repulsion force: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

The lower magnetic member moves into the detection zone of the magnetically controlled switch to close the switch and the electric control circuit when the plunger is in the actuated position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10939784B2Food processor non-contact interlock
Publication Date: 2021.03.09 WHIRLPOOL CORP
  • US10939784B2 patent drawing
  • US10939784B2 patent drawing
  • US10939784B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A food processing container includes a food processing chamber and a cover assembly with a latch mechanism operable between latched and unlatched positions. The latch mechanism includes a first magnetic member disposed therein. An interlock assembly is disposed outside of and adjacent to the food processing chamber and includes a sealed cavity with a plunger member moveable disposed within the sealed cavity. The plunger is operable between at-rest and actuated positions within the sealed cavity and includes upper and lower magnetic members disposed at opposite ends of the plunger member. The plunger member moves to the actuated position as the latch mechanism moves to the latched position due to a repulsion force between the first magnetic member and the upper magnetic member, and further wherein the lower magnetic member moves into the lower portion of the sealed cavity as the latch mechanism moves to the latched position.