Food Processor Magnetic Interlock for Contamination-Free Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical interlock systems in food processors are susceptible to contamination by liquids and food substrates, leading to impaired functionality and cleaning difficulties.

Innovation Solution

A non-contact interlock system using magnetic members and a sealed cavity to detect the proper positioning of the cover assembly, ensuring the motor is only powered when the container is correctly seated, thus preventing contact with contaminants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a mechanical interlock system is used to detect cover positioning, then the interlock functionality is achieved, but the system is susceptible to contamination by liquids and food substrates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlock functionalityVSAvoidcontamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical contact-based interlock system with a magnetic field-based detection system. Magnetic members are positioned on the cover assembly and base, interacting through a sealed cavity without physical contact. This substitution eliminates the mechanical components that would otherwise be exposed to and contaminated by food substrates and liquids, while maintaining reliable interlock functionality through magnetic attraction detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a sealed cavity (essentially a protective enclosure) that isolates the magnetic detection components from the food processing environment. This sealed structure prevents liquids and food substrates from contacting the interlock mechanism, thereby eliminating contamination issues while allowing the magnetic field to penetrate through the sealed barrier for detection purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Ease of operation

If mechanical interlock components are exposed to the food processing environment, then the interlock mechanism can detect cover positioning, but cleaning becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlock detectionVSAvoidcleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing exposed mechanical components with magnetic field interaction through a sealed cavity, the system eliminates parts that would require cleaning. The magnetic members remain isolated within the sealed environment, making the exterior surfaces easy to clean while maintaining detection functionality through non-contact magnetic field penetration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the sensitive interlock detection components (magnetic members) from the food-exposed environment by positioning them within a sealed cavity. This separation allows the detection mechanism to remain isolated from contamination sources, making the food-contact surfaces simple and easy to clean while preserving the interlock detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a non-contact magnetic interlock system is used, then contamination is prevented, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination resistanceVSAvoidinterlock system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical linkages, moving parts, and contact-based detection mechanisms with a simpler magnetic field-based system. The magnetic members and sealed cavity create a straightforward non-contact detection approach that eliminates the need for complex mechanical assemblies, thereby reducing overall device complexity while achieving contamination resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a reliable and clean interlock mechanism that is resistant to contamination, ensuring consistent operation and easy maintenance by using magnetic repulsion to actuate a switch within a sealed cavity, ensuring the motor is only powered when the container is properly positioned.

Implementation Method 1

The plunger member moves to the actuated position as the latch mechanism moves to the latched position due to a repulsion force between the first magnetic member of the latch mechanism and the upper magnetic member of the plunger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic repulsion: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

The lower magnetic member moves into the detection zone of the magnetically controlled switch to close the switch and the electric control circuit when the plunger is in the actuated position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11266272B2Food processor non-contact interlock
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 WHIRLPOOL CORP
  • US11266272B2 patent drawing
  • US11266272B2 patent drawing
  • US11266272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A food processing container includes a food processing chamber and a cover assembly with a latch mechanism operable between latched and unlatched positions. The latch mechanism includes a first magnetic member disposed therein. An interlock assembly is disposed outside of and adjacent to the food processing chamber and includes a sealed cavity with a plunger member moveable disposed within the sealed cavity. The plunger is operable between at-rest and actuated positions within the sealed cavity and includes upper and lower magnetic members disposed at opposite ends of the plunger member. The plunger member moves to the actuated position as the latch mechanism moves to the latched position due to a repulsion force between the first magnetic member and the upper magnetic member, and further wherein the lower magnetic member moves into the lower portion of the sealed cavity as the latch mechanism moves to the latched position.