Food Sample Bacterial Concentration via Protease Pre-treatment and Filtration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting bacteria in food samples are inefficient due to the complexity and diversity of food matrices, requiring significant enrichment time and large sample volumes, leading to poor representativeness and low yield, especially when contamination levels are low.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-step filtration process using proteases to degrade proteins and improve filtration, allowing for the concentration and purification of target bacteria, using filters with specific pore sizes and a preparation device for efficient sample preparation, enabling quick analysis with high bacterial concentration from a limited initial sample.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional detection methods are used, then bacteria can be detected, but the process requires significant enrichment time (7-26 hours) and large sample volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidenrichment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing protease treatment and filtration steps before the actual bacterial detection. The method pre-processes the food matrix by degrading proteins that interfere with detection, concentrating bacteria through filtration, and removing inhibitors beforehand. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for long enrichment periods (7-26 hours) while maintaining detection sensitivity, reducing the process to just a few hours.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If large sample volumes are used to obtain sufficient bacteria, then detection sensitivity improves, but the representativeness of the sample decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidsample volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by selectively separating target bacteria from the complex food matrix through filtration. The method extracts bacteria from large volumes of food matrix (up to 100 mL or more) by passing them through filters with specific pore sizes, concentrating the bacteria in a small final volume while maintaining the representativeness of the original sample. This allows achieving detection sensitivity equivalent to large sample volumes using only small final sample quantities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Quantity of substance

If filtration is performed on complex food matrices, then bacteria concentration improves, but filter clogging occurs due to proteins and debris

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacterial concentrationVSAvoidfiltration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by treating the food matrix with proteases before filtration to degrade proteins and debris that would otherwise clog the filters. This pre-treatment step simplifies the filtration process by removing interfering substances, allowing direct filtration of complex food matrices without filter clogging, and enabling efficient bacterial concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of time

If rapid detection techniques are used, then analysis time is reduced, but sensitivity and bacterial concentration remain insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection timeVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the merging principle by combining multiple functions into a single integrated filtration device. The device simultaneously concentrates bacteria, removes interfering substances, and prepares samples for detection in one operation. This merged approach achieves both rapid processing (reducing time losses) and high sensitivity (through effective concentration and purification), eliminating the trade-off between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances filtration efficiency, reduces sample volume requirements, and improves bacterial recovery, providing a more representative and efficient analysis of bacteria in food samples, compatible with techniques like q-PCR, LAMP, and sequencing.

Implementation Method 1

a second dilution of the sample already diluted during the previous step with a liquid containing a protease

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProteolysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 2

This filtration step is implemented by using a second filter F2 having pores of a size smaller than that of the pores of the first filter F1 used during prefiltration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP3654011B1Method for preparing a sample to be analysed obtained from a food matrix
Publication Date: 2022.06.29 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP3654011B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3654011B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C
  • EP3654011B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for preparing a sample from a food matrix sample, said sample containing biological species to be analyzed, the method comprising: - A step (E3) of diluting a first sample from said sample with a protease for a sufficient time to degrade said first sample and obtain a second liquid sample, - A step (E4) of pre-filtering said second liquid sample through a first filter (F1) to separate first molecules (M1) which are larger than the pores of said first filter (F1), in order to obtain a third sample comprising the biological species to be analyzed and second molecules (M2) smaller than the pores of said first filter, - A step (E5) of filtering said third sample through a second filter (F2) to separate said biological species from said second molecules (M2).