Automated Food Trap Detection Using Multi-Modal Scanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting and treating food traps in teeth are inadequate, relying on patient awareness and manual oral hygiene practices, which can lead to plaque buildup, dental issues, and gum disease.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods using computing devices for automated detection and prediction of food traps through scanning technologies like 2D, 3D, near-infrared, and CBCT scanning, combined with machine learning algorithms, to provide feedback and treatment options for orthodontic and prosthodontic interventions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated detection systems with multiple scanning technologies are implemented, then detection precision and reliability improve, but device complexity and computing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood trap detection precisionVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent scanning components (2D scanner, 3D scanner, near-infrared scanner, CBCT scanner), each performing a specific function. This allows the system to achieve high detection precision through multiple specialized sensors while managing complexity by dividing the overall detection task into separate, modular scanning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multiple scanning technologies that can detect different properties of food traps (visual appearance, three-dimensional structure, subsurface characteristics, bone density). Each scanner serves multiple purposes: 2D for surface visualization, 3D for spatial mapping, near-infrared for subsurface detection, and CBCT for bone density assessment, creating a universal detection platform that handles various detection needs through a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple scanning technologies and machine learning algorithms are used, then treatment planning accuracy improves, but computing resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment planning accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning and data collection using multiple technologies (2D, 3D, near-infrared, CBCT) to gather comprehensive information about food traps before treatment planning begins. Machine learning algorithms pre-process this data to identify patterns and predict treatment outcomes, allowing clinicians to make informed decisions without requiring intensive real-time computing during the actual treatment planning session.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates detailed digital copies and three-dimensional models of the patient's oral cavity and bone structure based on scanning data. These virtual replicas allow for treatment simulation and planning in a digital environment, reducing the need for multiple physical examinations and minimizing the computational load during actual treatment execution by having pre-processed model data available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If comprehensive scanning and analysis are performed, then detection reliability improves, but processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood trap detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual visual inspection and physical examination methods with automated scanning technologies (2D, 3D, near-infrared, CBCT) and machine learning algorithms. This substitution increases detection reliability by eliminating human error and subjectivity while improving processing efficiency through automated data acquisition and analysis, as the computational processing occurs rapidly without requiring sequential manual assessment steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves the detection and treatment of food traps, enhancing dental health outcomes by reducing computing resources, improving processing efficiency, and providing more effective dental treatment planning.

Implementation Method 1

scanning a patient's dentition with a 2D scanner, a 3D scanner, a near-infrared scanner, and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner to generate scan data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNear-infrared scanning: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

scanning a patient's dentition with a 2D scanner, a 3D scanner, a near-infrared scanner, and a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner to generate scan data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCone beam computed tomography: Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS20240374144A1Systems and methods for identifying and correcting food traps
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 ALIGN TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20240374144A1 patent drawing
  • US20240374144A1 patent drawing
  • US20240374144A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for treating food traps may include an intraoral scanner and a processor coupled in electronic communication with the intraoral scanner, a processor, and memory comprising instructions that when executed by the processor cause the system to carry out a method. The method may include receiving a 3D digital model of a patient's detention and analyzing the 3D digital model of the patient's detention by detecting anatomic structures in the 3D digital model of the patient's detention that correspond to food traps. The 3D digital model of the patient's detention may be displayed on a display and digital feedback may be provided on the displayed 3D digital model of the patient's detention. The feedback may identify a location of the food traps.