Foot Control Pattern for Work Machine Operator Freedom

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional work machines require operators to use both hands to control multiple functions, leading to reduced productivity and inconvenience when adjusting settings, as operators must release one hand to perform tasks like adjusting throttle or changing controls.

Innovation Solution

A foot control pattern that allows for the use of a single hand to control machine functions, with a first foot control for the boom, a second foot control for the bucket, and a first hand control for propulsion and steering, while disabling the second hand control to free the operator for other tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the operator uses both hands to control joysticks or levers, then the machine can be controlled safely and稳vably, but the operator must release one hand to adjust throttle or change settings, reducing productivity and causing operational interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator freedom to adjust controlsVSAvoidmachine operational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions are segmented between foot controls and hand controls. Specifically, the throttle control is separated from hand-operated joysticks and assigned to a foot-operated pedal, dividing the control system into distinct operational zones (foot zone for throttle, hand zone for joysticks) that can be operated simultaneously without interference, thereby maintaining continuous productivity while enabling easy adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple controls are provided for multiple functions, then the machine can perform diverse tasks, but the complexity of controls increases, requiring more training and cognitive load from the operator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine functional capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foot-operated controls are designed to perform multiple functions. The foot pedals can control throttle, range selection, and other machine functions, allowing a single control interface (foot zone) to handle multiple operational parameters that would traditionally require separate hand controls, thereby reducing overall control complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the operator must release one hand from a joystick to adjust settings, then the control can be adjusted, but the machine operates at less than optimal performance with lower productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adjust settingsVSAvoidmachine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The throttle control function is extracted from the hand-operated joystick system and placed in the foot-operated pedal zone. This extraction allows the thumb to remain on the joystick for continuous precision control while the foot independently controls throttle and other functions, eliminating the need to release the joystick and maintaining optimal machine performance during adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9181676B2Machine foot control operational pattern and method thereof
Publication Date: 2015.11.10 DEERE & CO
  • US9181676B2 patent drawing
  • US9181676B2 patent drawing
  • US9181676B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a foot control pattern for operably controlling an electrohydraulic machine. The machine includes a cab, ground engaging mechanisms, a boom, and a bucket. The foot control pattern includes a machine controller having a plurality of inputs. A first foot control is electrically coupled to a first of the plurality of inputs, where the first foot control is adapted to control the boom. A second foot control is electrically coupled to a second of the plurality of inputs, where the second foot control is adapted to control the bucket. A first hand control is electrically coupled to a third of the plurality of inputs, where the first hand control is adapted to propel and steer the machine.