Foot-Pedal Flapping Fin Propulsion for Hands-Free Watercraft Steering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hand-powered personal watercrafts are inefficient in utilizing the user's power, as arms are weaker than legs, and require hands for both propulsion and steering, while foot-powered systems like Ketterman's oscillating fin propulsion are prone to damage and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A flapping manual propulsion system using symmetrical fins driven by foot pedals, with a mechanism that converts foot motion into a continuous scissor-like motion through cranks and cables, allowing efficient propulsion without hands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If hand-powered paddles are used for propulsion, then the watercraft can be propelled, but the user's power is not fully utilized because arms are weaker than legs and hands must be used for both propulsion and steering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser power utilizationVSAvoidsteering operation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the hand-powered paddle mechanism with a foot-powered oscillating fin mechanism. The user's legs (which are stronger) drive the system through foot pedals that convert leg pumping motion into fin oscillation, substituting the weak arm-hand mechanical system with a stronger leg-foot mechanical system. This resolves the contradiction by fully utilizing leg power while freeing hands for steering operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent separates the propulsion function from the steering function. Propulsion is handled by the foot-powered oscillating fin system, while hands are freed to perform steering and other operations. This multi-functionality assignment resolves the contradiction by allowing hands to serve multiple purposes (steering, fishing apparatus operation) while the fin system handles propulsion exclusively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If Ketterman's oscillating fin propulsion system is used, then foot power can be utilized, but the fins extend vertically into the water making them prone to damage in shallow water

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot power utilizationVSAvoidfin damage resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fin orientation from vertical extension (Ketterman's design) to horizontal extension. The fins extend horizontally from the sides of the watercraft rather than vertically downward, making them less susceptible to damage in shallow water while still effective for propulsion through oscillating motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Power

If Ketterman's oscillating fin propulsion system is used, then foot power can be utilized, but the mechanism to convert foot pumping motion to fin oscillating is complex and less efficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot power utilizationVSAvoidmotion conversion mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the complex motion conversion mechanism from Ketterman's design. Instead of using a complicated system to convert foot pumping motion to fin oscillation, the invention directly couples the foot pedal motion to the fin oscillation through a simplified linkage, removing unnecessary intermediate components and reducing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by having the fin oscillate in response to foot pedal depression rather than using a complex mechanism to translate vertical foot motion into horizontal fin motion. The direct linkage allows the fin to oscillate naturally as the foot pedal moves, simplifying the motion conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively utilizes leg power for continuous propulsion, reducing the need for hands and minimizing damage, enhancing the efficiency and usability of personal watercrafts.

Implementation Method 1

A upper end of the left extension 123L is mounted with a left pulley wheel 203L. One end of a cable 412 is attached to the forward end of the left fin 102L, and the other end of the cable 412 is attached to the left pulley wheel 203L

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPulley: Pulley

Data Source

PatentUS20260028106A1Flapping manual propulsion system for personal watercraft
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 JIANG PEIGEN
  • US20260028106A1 patent drawing
  • US20260028106A1 patent drawing
  • US20260028106A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A manual propulsion system for a watercraft includes an axle horizontally mounted below a bottom surface of the watercraft in a direction perpendicular to a centerline of the watercraft, an elongated fin rotatable around the axle, the elongated fin being oriented along the centerline of the watercraft, a location of the axle dividing the elongated fin into a forward portion in front of the axle and an aft portion behind the axle in reference to a travel direction of the watercraft, the forward portion being shorter than the aft portion, a first foot pedal linked to the forward portion of the elongated fin, a forward motion by the first foot pedal lifting the forward portion of the elongated fin, and a second foot pedal linked to the aft portion of the elongated fin, a forward motion by the second foot pedal lifting the aft portion of the elongated fin.